Teams

“What Do You Mean It’s OUT”?

2022 65 and OVER - MAGIC VALLEY · Women 7.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.08 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-09vs TerminettersWon 21
W#1 DoublesCathy Cooper / Nancy Silva vs Molly Arrossa / Mary Austin6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJudy Graf / Mary Schmidt vs Lana Penrose / Kim Ward7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Whitney / Elizabeth Lassen vs Pat Struchen / Annette Barnum7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2022-09-07vs TerminettersWon 21
W#1 DoublesCathy Cooper / Susan Whitney vs Pat Struchen / Kim Ward6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Lassen / Nancy Silva vs Molly Arrossa / Annette Barnum1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJudy Graf / Connie Maughan vs Mary Austin / Lana Penrose6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-08-22vs TerminettersLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Lassen / Nancy Silva vs Molly Arrossa / Annette Barnum3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJudy Graf / Connie Maughan vs Pat Struchen / Rita Jackson6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMary Schmidt / Susan Whitney vs Mary Austin / Kim Ward7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-19vs TerminettersWon 21
W#1 DoublesCathy Cooper / Judy Graf vs Lana Penrose / Pat Struchen6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNancy Silva / Connie Maughan vs Molly Arrossa / Annette Barnum2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Lassen / Susan Whitney vs Mary Austin / Rita Jackson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-08-15vs TerminettersWon 21
W#1 DoublesCathy Cooper / Judy Graf vs Molly Arrossa / Annette Barnum6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Lassen / Connie Maughan vs Rita Jackson / Kim Ward6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMary Schmidt / Susan Whitney vs Mary Austin / Lana Penrose1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1“What Do You Mean It’s OUT”?419615121
2Terminetters146921147

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Judy Graf
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.98
Nancy Silva
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Cathy Cooper
published 3.5
2.90
Elizabeth Lassen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.81
Connie Maughan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.72
Susan Whitney
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Mary Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Graf + Cathy Cooper4260% games+14.8% vs expected
Cathy Cooper + Nancy Silva1545% games+2.1% vs expected
Susan Whitney + Judy Graf5549% games−4.5% vs expected
Nancy Silva + Elizabeth Lassen41041% games−5.3% vs expected
Connie Maughan + Judy Graf11453% games−8.8% vs expected
Susan Whitney + Nancy Silva1441% games−18.6% vs expected
Susan Whitney + Elizabeth Lassen2636% games−20.4% vs expected
Connie Maughan + Elizabeth Lassen1437% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Judy Graf
97W–76L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Nancy Silva
38W–43L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
3.5
Cathy Cooper
50W–22L career · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Elizabeth Lassen
36W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Connie Maughan
53W–77L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Susan Whitney
46W–65L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.72
Mary Schmidt
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.