Teams

MTwer (WSRC)

2024 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Thurs PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2024-08-04vs MThompson (Windyrush)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesMichael Twer vs Darden Blow6-7, 2-6
2024-08-01vs JDichak (WSRC)Split 11
L#1 SinglesDaniel Kolepp vs Frank Grindle7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMichael Twer vs Alberto Botero6-1, 6-4
2024-07-25vs GEstrada (Queens)Won 21
W#1 SinglesDaniel Kolepp vs Jared Mitchell7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBradley Holcman vs Ivan Blakeney5-7, 5-7
W#3 SinglesMichael Twer vs Gerardo Estrada6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMike Gentile vs Rusty Parker2-6, 1-6
2024-07-12vs WLewis (Charlotte Tennis NC)Split 11
W#1 SinglesDaniel Kolepp vs Will Lewis III6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMichael Twer vs Scott MacIntosh1-6, 3-6
2024-06-27vs DDemaine (Queens)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesMike Gentile vs Cameron Lober0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesBradley Holcman vs Timothy Crites3-6, 4-6
2024-06-20vs XTang (Park Road)Won 10
W#3 SinglesBradley Holcman vs Yuefeng Han6-2, 2-1
2024-06-17vs MJarzynski (Park Road)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesMichael Twer vs Damian Hamp-Adams1-6, 6-7
2024-06-13Won 20
W#1 SinglesDaniel Kolepp vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesBradley Holcman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-30Lost 01
L#2 SinglesBradley Holcman vs Andrew Dsouza0-6, 3-6
2024-05-23Won 10
W#2 SinglesMike Gentile vs Dean Brown6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Daniel Kolepp
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Bradley Holcman
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Adam Dawson
published 3.5
3.15
Mike Gentile
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Michael Twer
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
Vladislav Valtsis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Kolepp + Adam Dawson7066% games+12.0% vs expected
Daniel Kolepp + Bradley Holcman4164% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Kolepp + Mike Gentile314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Twer + Mike Gentile213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel Kolepp
164W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Bradley Holcman
63W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Adam Dawson
16W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Mike Gentile
114W–104L career · 3 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Michael Twer
50W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Vladislav Valtsis
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.