Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW3.5B-DT

2025 ADULT 18&Over - Daytime · Women 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Amber Golini
published 3.5
3.61
Lang Lindsay
published
3.50
Kathy Maratukulam
published
3.46
Leah Vachani
published
3.33
Jessica Vasisht
published
3.33
Maria Rueda
published
3.26
Arlene Acosta
published 3.5
3.26
Valerie Epting
published
Caitlin Stahle
published 3.5
3.14
Kris Courtney
published
3.10
Megan Thomas
published
3.06
Mary Soe
published
3.05
2.99
Elena Dudek
published 3
2.89
Lacy Zhu
published
2.86
Michelle Gonzales
published
2.86
Jing Wu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.54
Kristen Steinert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Miwa Yoneyama
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Rueda + Leah Vachani314 matchesnot enough data
Kris Courtney + Veronika Mora-Mieszkowski123 matchesnot enough data
Maria Rueda + Valerie Epting123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amber Golini
36W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.71
Lang Lindsay
44W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.61
Kathy Maratukulam
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Leah Vachani
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Jessica Vasisht
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Maria Rueda
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Arlene Acosta
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Valerie Epting
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Caitlin Stahle
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kris Courtney
15W–20L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Megan Thomas
10W–16L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Mary Soe
16W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
Veronika Mora-Mieszkowski
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Elena Dudek
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Lacy Zhu
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Michelle Gonzales
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
2.86
Jing Wu
17W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.86
Kristen Steinert
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%39%61%
2.54
Miwa Yoneyama
7W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.