Teams

Samuell Grand/Roos-Oliver W4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-01vs SpringPark/Coates W4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesHolly Lewis / Maria Hasbany vs Melissa Sipes / Cindy Taylor7-5, 6-4
2024-10-25vs Lakes/Buckalew-Criswell W4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesLeigh Breunig / Holly Lewis vs Tracy Constantino / Teri Doyle6-1, 6-4
2024-10-11vs Prince of Peace/Trostel W4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesMeg Lohr / Leah Oliver vs Kathryn Moore / Karen Pannell6-3, 6-1
2024-10-04Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMaria Hasbany / Leah Oliver vs Jennifer Lee / Marnie Pizzitola4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-27vs Garland/Smith W4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesMaria Hasbany / Leigh Breunig vs Bonnie Shea / Michelle Hefner6-3, 7-5
2024-09-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeah Oliver / Maria Hasbany vs Kate LaGere / Sarah Hamlin7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Laura Reynolds
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
4.02
Meg Lohr
usually #3 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
3.92
Shannon Hogan
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.82
Louise Bexley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Erin Lange
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Tricia Roos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Holly Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.75
Leah Oliver
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Jerilynn Fletcher
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Maria Hasbany
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.68
Jill McGill
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Leigh Breunig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Kasey Colvin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Mary Beirute
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Brenda Talavera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Karen Saland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Tina Kimbell
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meg Lohr + Louise Bexley7071% games+7.6% vs expected
Erin Lange + Tricia Roos9255% games+3.5% vs expected
Tricia Roos + Louise Bexley8657% games−1.7% vs expected
Maria Hasbany + Leah Oliver5156% gamesnot enough data
Tricia Roos + Laura Reynolds314 matchesnot enough data
Erin Lange + Jill McGill123 matchesnot enough data
Erin Lange + Laura Reynolds303 matchesnot enough data
Mary Beirute + Jerilynn Fletcher213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Reynolds
33W–6L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
4.06
Meg Lohr
53W–14L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
4.02
Shannon Hogan
22W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.92
Louise Bexley
37W–9L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Erin Lange
61W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
Tricia Roos
31W–17L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Holly Lewis
23W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.75
Leah Oliver
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.75
Jerilynn Fletcher
36W–22L career · 8 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Maria Hasbany
17W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Jill McGill
37W–14L career · 12 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Leigh Breunig
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.64
Kasey Colvin
13W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
Mary Beirute
12W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Brenda Talavera
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Karen Saland
15W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Tina Kimbell
19W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.