Teams

Garland/Smith W4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-01vs Prince of Peace/Trostel W4.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesAnita Kovacs vs Helen Young2-2
W#2 DoublesKristl Pearl / Jazmine Goncalves vs Kay Gaskill / Karen Pannell7-5, 6-2
2024-10-25Lost 02
L#2 DoublesNatalie Clarkson / Jazmine Goncalves vs Kelda Rusher / Jennifer Lee3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmelia White / Margaret Hoyt vs Christina Perron / Marnie Pizzitola3-6, 3-6
2024-10-11vs DCC/Chilian W4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesAlyssa Bauer / Kristl Pearl vs Katherine Herron / Alissa Gearing6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnita Kovacs / Bonnie Shea vs Pam Bowman / Cassandra Johnson6-2, 6-2
2024-10-04Split 11
L#2 DoublesKatie Tran / Bonnie Shea vs Sally Roberts / Tiffany Webster5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristl Pearl / Natalie Clarkson vs Heather Evetts / Amy Timmerman6-2, 6-1
2024-09-27vs Samuell Grand/Roos-Oliver W4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBonnie Shea / Michelle Hefner vs Maria Hasbany / Leigh Breunig3-6, 5-7
2024-09-20Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMargaret Hoyt / Anita Kovacs vs Cindy Taylor / Sandy Seaton6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-09-13Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAmelia White / Kristl Pearl vs Sanella Wertz / Karen Buckalew6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnita Kovacs / Margaret Hoyt vs Jill Fain / Julie Hoang4-6, 3-6
2024-09-06vs Coppell HS/He W4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKristl Pearl / Amelia White vs Nicole Taylor / Wesley Wilson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1High Point/Soldan-Craft W4.09033313191
2Colleyville Park/Coffindaffer W4.08028414181
3Garland/Smith W4.053171532251
4DAC/Jolly-Wheeler W4.044181430263
5High Point/Jenkins-Osborne W4.044171536299
6Coppell HS/He W4.044161637289
7Prince of Peace/Trostel W4.044131941312
8DCC/Chilian W4.035122042310
9Gleneagles/Shukis-LofgrenW4.027162046341
10Fretz/Dodgen W4.027122453360
11SpringPark/Coates W4.01772553344
12Lakewood/Lamberson W4.01762656351
13Brook Hollow/Cass-Aisner W4.0000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Alyssa Bauer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published 4.5
4.21
Alexandra Northington
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.94
Natalie Clarkson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Gilda Tebeaux
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Anita Kovacs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.71
Katie Tran
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
3.69
Bonnie Shea
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Kristl Pearl
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.64
Danielle White
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.63
Dawn Ritz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.57
Michelle Hefner
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Amelia White
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jazmine Goncalves
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Margaret Hoyt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Tran + Danielle White6156% games+1.4% vs expected
Michelle Hefner + Kristl Pearl7354% games−1.2% vs expected
Michelle Hefner + Natalie Clarkson224 matchesnot enough data
Katie Tran + Michelle Hefner303 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Hefner + Danielle White213 matchesnot enough data
Danielle White + Natalie Clarkson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alyssa Bauer
43W–26L career · 12 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Alexandra Northington
24W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.21
Natalie Clarkson
21W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Gilda Tebeaux
37W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Anita Kovacs
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Tran
33W–19L career · 9 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Bonnie Shea
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.69
Kristl Pearl
17W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Danielle White
18W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Dawn Ritz
49W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.63
Michelle Hefner
30W–40L career · 9 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Amelia White
19W–23L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
Jazmine Goncalves
12W–7L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Hoyt
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.