Teams

2-ROakley-EV 40 6.5

2023 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-10vs 3-JMontague-CCC 40Split 11
L#2 DoublesReggie Oakley / Bart Smith vs Travis Angle / Brent Fox3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRyan Boyles / Carl Laird vs Robert Long / Richard Riedel7-5, 6-3
2023-10-03vs 4-RMcGarrah-HRWon 20
W#2 DoublesBart Smith / Carl Laird vs Marvin Davis / Jerome Croan6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLee Goldberg / Tom Luben vs Ashraf Habib / Mark Fossum6-4, 6-4
2023-09-19vs 1-MHolt-HS-6.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesAaron Young / Carl Laird vs Michael Holt / Dave Thomas6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTom Luben / Duffy Guschel vs Mark Macdonald / David Nagelhout6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-05vs 3-JMontague-CCC 40Lost 01
L#3 DoublesReggie Oakley / Duffy Guschel vs Brent Fox / Richard Riedel2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-08-29vs 4-RMcGarrah-HRSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChris Reeves / Carl Laird vs Mattias Rostin / James McWhorter6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDaniel Horowitz / Tom Luben vs Jefferson Balin / Matt Williamson2-6, 3-6
2023-08-27vs 1-MHolt-HS-6.5Split 11
L#2 DoublesReggie Oakley / Carl Laird vs Dirk Kumashiro / Jeffrey Szafran5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTom Luben / Duffy Guschel vs Steve Berntsen / David Nagelhout6-3, 6-2
2023-08-22vs 5-MBland-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Reeves / Carl Laird vs Terrence Tan / Carmelo Cataudella4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Dan Dillon
published 3.5
3.18
Chris Reeves
published 3.5
3.15
Bart Smith
published 3.5
2.92
Daniel Horowitz
published 3.5
2.87
Carl Laird
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Duffy Guschel
published
2.79
Tom Luben
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Ryan Boyles
published
2.69
Reggie Oakley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Lee Goldberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reggie Oakley + Tom Luben3347% gamesnot enough data
Carl Laird + Reggie Oakley1444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dan Dillon
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Chris Reeves
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Bart Smith
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Daniel Horowitz
1W–12L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Carl Laird
42W–77L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.87
Duffy Guschel
25W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Tom Luben
85W–115L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
Ryan Boyles
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Reggie Oakley
56W–103L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Lee Goldberg
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.