Teams

Albright 4.0W 40s Sun

2024 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesMaggie Riley / Christina Rush vs Ann Morris / Kelly Miller6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-05-11vs Cartee 4.0W 40s SundayWon 10
W#1 DoublesSara Nundkumar / Maggie Riley vs Janet Fortney / Kimberly Koontz6-2, 6-1
2024-04-28vs Cartee 4.0W 40s SundayWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaggie Riley / Tammy Kasik vs Dawn Frank / Kimberly Koontz6-1, 6-1
2024-04-07vs Cartee 4.0W 40s SundayWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaggie Riley / Sarah Joplin vs Mimi Cartee / Dee Wilson7-6, 6-2
2024-03-10vs Cartee 4.0W 40s SundayWon 10
W#2 DoublesTammy Kasik / Maggie Riley vs Janet Fortney / Dawn Frank6-3, 6-2
2024-03-03vs Milam 4.0W 40s SundayWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaggie Riley / Sara Nundkumar vs Cynthia Sarwi / Saundra Westervelt6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Christina Rush
published 4.5
3.93
Sarah Dunning
published
3.90
Brenda Willis
published 4
3.88
Marla Barnwell
published
3.81
Sara Nundkumar
published
3.79
Penny Trivette
published
3.78
Sarah Joplin
published
3.71
Carole Albright
published 4
3.65
3.59
Maggie Riley
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.54
Tammy Kasik
published
3.17
Aprille Black
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Dunning + Brenda Willis10364% games+8.0% vs expected
Marla Barnwell + Sarah Dunning7555% games+1.9% vs expected
Danielle Broadstreet + Sara Nundkumar0535% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Riley + Aprille Black033 matchesnot enough data
Marla Barnwell + Brenda Willis213 matchesnot enough data
Marla Barnwell + Sara Nundkumar303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina Rush
19W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.28
Sarah Dunning
34W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.93
4
Brenda Willis
31W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.90
Marla Barnwell
42W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.88
Sara Nundkumar
22W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Penny Trivette
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
Sarah Joplin
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Carole Albright
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Danielle Broadstreet
16W–18L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
Maggie Riley
52W–50L career · 6 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.59
Tammy Kasik
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Aprille Black
11W–21L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.