Teams

SD 3.5WE Balboa TC/ Irving

2022 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SD WE Women · SD- Women - WE 3.5 (SD

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-13vs SD 3.5WE SDTRC/ MonzonLost 02
L#1 DoublesKris Temple / Amy Rorstad vs Diane Boudreau / Donna Dube1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAlmira MacIas vs Whitney Ginter4-6, 3-6
2022-03-06vs SDNC 3.5WE RPTC/ ChenWon 10
W#1 SinglesAlmira MacIas vs Tomoko Hoffman7-5, 6-4
2022-02-27vs SD 3.5WE Peninsula TC/ WilkinsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichele Kelley / Amy Rorstad vs Kim Schwab / Cherie Hibbs1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAlmira MacIas vs Lisa Mallory0-2
2022-02-20vs SD 3.5WE Mountain View/ CorbittLost 02
L#1 SinglesAmy Rorstad vs Paola Romo3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlmira MacIas / Michele Kelley vs Maria Corbitt / Zahira Vargas3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Rorstad / Kris Temple vs Ashley Bull / Lisa Hunter2-6, 1-6
2022-02-06vs SD 3.5WE SDTRC/ MonzonLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Olson / Almira MacIas vs Cheryle Pillow / Diane Boudreau6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Rorstad vs Whitney Ginter2-6, 4-6
2022-01-30vs SDNC 3.5WE RPTC/ ChenLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Rorstad / Almira MacIas vs Ann Hou / Grace Reyno4-6, 4-6
2022-01-16vs SD 3.5WE Mountain View/ CorbittLost 01
L#1 SinglesAlmira MacIas vs Paola Romo6-7, 6-7
2022-01-09Won 10
W#1 SinglesAlmira MacIas vs Leah Christensen6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women - WE 3.5 (SD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Almira MacIas
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Gabriela LARA
published 3.5
3.24
Mer Chiodo
published
2.97
Kris Temple
published
2.86
Michele Kelley
published
2.80
Amy Rorstad
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Evelyn Irving
published 3
Linda Olson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Rorstad + Almira MacIas7351% gamesnot enough data
Michele Kelley + Amy Rorstad303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Almira MacIas
56W–60L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Gabriela LARA
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Mer Chiodo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Kris Temple
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
Michele Kelley
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Amy Rorstad
82W–150L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Evelyn Irving
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Olson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.