Teams

TIBURON PEN C 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-14vs SAN FRAN ST U 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#1 SinglesSara Singerman vs Stephanie Harvey7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-08vs YMCA PRESIDIO 40AW3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesJessica Kaludis / Sara Singerman vs Elizabeth Tasker / Feyna Oman6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Kathleen Goodhart
published
3.48
Sara Singerman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Victoria Tucker
published
3.46
Lisa Westley
published
3.44
Elizabeth Lougee
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Elaine Moore
published 3.5
3.40
Susan Terrell
published
3.40
Jessica Madani
published
3.35
Stacy Achuck
published
3.31
Wendy Fraser
published
3.30
Kate Wyss
published
3.27
Jayme Catanese
published
3.18
Angela Webster
published 3.5
3.13
Amanda Rickel
published 3.5
2.99
Marine Strage
published
2.93
Jena Watson
published
2.83
Kim Sichel
published
2.69
Marisa McArthur
published
Kimberly Pewitt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Singerman + Stacy Achuck7162% games+6.7% vs expected
Jessica Madani + Kathleen Goodhart3259% gamesnot enough data
Susan Terrell + Kathleen Goodhart123 matchesnot enough data
Angela Webster + Jayme Catanese123 matchesnot enough data
Jayme Catanese + Elaine Moore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Goodhart
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Sara Singerman
19W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Victoria Tucker
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Lisa Westley
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
4
Elizabeth Lougee
23W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.44
3.5
Elaine Moore
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
Susan Terrell
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Jessica Madani
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Stacy Achuck
11W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
Wendy Fraser
15W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Kate Wyss
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Jayme Catanese
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Angela Webster
6W–17L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Amanda Rickel
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.13
Marine Strage
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Jena Watson
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Kim Sichel
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.83
Marisa McArthur
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%92%1%
2.69
Kimberly Pewitt
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.