Teams

CV-Palm Springs TC/Doris Hoffman

2023 SCTA Tri-Level - CV · CV Women 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-11vs CV-Indian Wells TG/GrayLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacey McCoy / Chris Mangan vs Renee Marrotte / Sally Sterling7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2023-05-28vs CV-Indian Wells TG/GraySplit 11
W#1 DoublesRoseann Harris / Stacey McCoy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCeleste Manolas / Carolyn Wright vs Patricia Taylor / Rebecca Jasmine6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesStacey McCoy / Roseann Harris vs Andrea Bowen / Dundeana Doyle6-2, 6-0
2023-05-14vs CV-Indian Wells TG/GraySplit 11
W#1 DoublesRoseann Harris / Maria Crema vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Wright / Susan Caruso vs Mary Fox / Barbara Holmsten7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Stacey McCoy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Maria Crema
published
4.01
Roseann Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
Tammy Pronenko
published
3.73
Maureen Jaramillo
published
3.51
Celeste Manolas
published 3.5
3.40
Doris Hoffmann
published
3.18
Carolyn Wright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Julie Exley
published
Monica McCready
published
Patricia Baughman
published
Staci Munic
published
Susan Caruso
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey McCoy + Roseann Harris371658% games+5.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stacey McCoy
145W–88L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
Maria Crema
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Roseann Harris
96W–74L career · 3 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
4.01
Tammy Pronenko
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.80
Maureen Jaramillo
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Celeste Manolas
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
Doris Hoffmann
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Carolyn Wright
93W–84L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Julie Exley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Monica McCready
92W–63L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Baughman
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Staci Munic
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Caruso
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.