Teams

DTC #1

2022 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 55 & OVER · 7.0 MEN- 55 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-20vs SPANISH OAKS #2Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Garvin / George Mulopulos vs Nicanor Cabrera / Reynaldo Ayala6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRobert Campbell / Edward Dibble vs Abdiel Yamomo / PEPITO RONQUILLO1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCraig Slayter / Thomas Waite vs Jonathan Rodriguez / Joe Delacuadra2-6, 4-6
2022-05-13vs DTC #2Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Garvin / George Mulopulos vs Jack Braman / Tony Cimber6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesThomas Waite / Edward Dibble vs Charles Jones / Brady Stevens5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Slayter / William Feast vs Daniel Vaughn / Jose Avila1-6, 4-6
2022-05-06vs NV/MENDICINO/ADULT 55 & OVER M7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSamuel Gordon / William Feast vs Dino Mendicino / Michael Miller5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Waite / Edward Dibble vs Mister Archedon / Gary Miller7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Garvin / George Mulopulos vs Robert Roig / Stephen Newell2-6, 0-6
2022-04-29vs SPANISH OAKS #2Split 11
W#2 DoublesWilliam Feast / Samuel Gordon vs Reynaldo Ayala / Meynardo Sanchez6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJC Cifuentes / Thomas Waite vs Jonathan Rodriguez / PEPITO RONQUILLO4-6, 1-6
2022-04-22vs DTC #2Won 20
W#1 DoublesWilliam Feast / Samuel Gordon vs Lee Robinson / Mark Brandon6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGeorge Mulopulos / Michael Garvin vs Charles Jones / Jose Avila6-2, 6-3
2022-04-08vs NV/MENDICINO/ADULT 55 & OVER M7.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesRobert Campbell / JC Cifuentes vs Robert Roig / Jim Roulias3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCraig Slayter / Michael Garvin vs James Santos / Michael Miller2-6, 3-6
2022-04-01vs SPANISH OAKS #2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Campbell / Edward Dibble vs Tony Devera / Miguel Becerra2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Garvin / George Mulopulos vs Nicanor Cabrera / Meynardo Sanchez7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesWilliam Feast / Stephen Cereghino vs Joe Delacuadra / Alfredo Sabillo6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-03-25vs DTC #2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Garvin / George Mulopulos vs Brady Stevens / Chris Stimson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Campbell / Edward Dibble vs Charles Jones / Troy Rabenstein3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesThomas Waite / Samuel Gordon vs Tony Cimber / Jack Braman3-6, 0-6
2022-03-18vs NV/MENDICINO/ADULT 55 & OVER M7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCraig Slayter / Stephen Cereghino vs Dino Mendicino / Mister Archedon3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Campbell / JC Cifuentes vs James Santos / Absalom Alcaraz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesThomas Waite / William Feast vs Michael Miller / Stephen Newell4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN- 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
George Mulopulos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.05
Samuel Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
William Feast
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Craig Slayter
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.65
Stephen Cereghino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.63
Thomas Waite
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Garvin
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Robert Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Waite + Samuel Gordon11439% games−4.2% vs expected
Samuel Gordon + William Feast4545% games−6.6% vs expected
Thomas Waite + William Feast41344% games−7.4% vs expected
Thomas Waite + Craig Slayter41937% games−8.4% vs expected
Craig Slayter + William Feast3744% games−9.5% vs expected
Michael Garvin + Craig Slayter2738% gamesnot enough data
George Mulopulos + Michael Garvin4256% gamesnot enough data
George Mulopulos + William Feast033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
George Mulopulos
122W–71L career · 6 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Samuel Gordon
26W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
William Feast
58W–182L career · 6 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Craig Slayter
103W–194L career · 4 lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
2.87
2.5
Stephen Cereghino
77W–105L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
0%13%87%
2.65
Thomas Waite
41W–133L career · 6 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
Michael Garvin
14W–55L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Campbell
70W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.