Teams

Jane's Addiction

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 4.08 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-05-30vs Love 'em & Leave 'emWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrea Johnson / Jesse Chavez vs Joe Salyer / Jennifer Nielson5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSara Hemmer / Cody Maynard vs Sarah Bach / Gordon Terpe6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJoshua Munro / Cyndy Desin vs Kenneth Sheehan / Mary Ritchie7-5, 7-5
2021-05-29vs Love 'em & Leave 'emWon 30
W#1 DoublesSara Hemmer / Cody Maynard vs Raymond Armstrong / Danielle Smith6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJesse Chavez / Andrea Johnson vs Mary Ritchie / Kenneth Sheehan6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoshua Munro / Cyndy Desin vs Gordon Terpe / Sarah Bach6-2, 6-3
2021-05-29vs Love 'em & Leave 'emWon 21
L#1 DoublesSara Hemmer / Cody Maynard vs Jennifer Nielson / Joe Salyer3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJesse Chavez / Andrea Johnson vs Raymond Armstrong / Danielle Smith6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoshua Munro / Cyndy Desin vs Kenneth Sheehan / Mary Ritchie7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1brad's 9.0 team227512109
2Irma's Kats226616122
3Jane's Addiction000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Jesse Chavez
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.14
Tony Lew
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.12
Joshua Munro
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.11
Jane McQuade
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Sara Hemmer
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
Cody Maynard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Akio Tsujino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
2.93
Cyndy Desin
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Hemmer + Joshua Munro2445% gamesnot enough data
Sara Hemmer + Cody Maynard3247% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Munro + Cyndy Desin5064% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jesse Chavez
40W–29L career · 5 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
4.16
Tony Lew
74W–59L career · 4 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Joshua Munro
52W–72L career · 7 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Jane McQuade
267W–181L career · 6 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Sara Hemmer
29W–32L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Cody Maynard
7W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Akio Tsujino
87W–51L career · 2 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Cyndy Desin
59W–102L career · 5 lines in 2021
71%29%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.