Teams

Love 'em & Leave 'em

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-05-30vs Jane's AddictionLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoe Salyer / Jennifer Nielson vs Andrea Johnson / Jesse Chavez7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Bach / Gordon Terpe vs Sara Hemmer / Cody Maynard3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKenneth Sheehan / Mary Ritchie vs Joshua Munro / Cyndy Desin5-7, 5-7
2021-05-29vs Jane's AddictionLost 03
L#1 DoublesRaymond Armstrong / Danielle Smith vs Sara Hemmer / Cody Maynard2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Ritchie / Kenneth Sheehan vs Jesse Chavez / Andrea Johnson3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGordon Terpe / Sarah Bach vs Joshua Munro / Cyndy Desin2-6, 3-6
2021-05-29vs Jane's AddictionLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Nielson / Joe Salyer vs Sara Hemmer / Cody Maynard6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRaymond Armstrong / Danielle Smith vs Jesse Chavez / Andrea Johnson2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKenneth Sheehan / Mary Ritchie vs Joshua Munro / Cyndy Desin7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Love 'em & Leave 'em031816100

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Mary Ritchie
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.89
Sarah Bach
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Danielle Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Gordon Terpe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jennifer Nielson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joe Salyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kenneth Sheehan
published
Raymond Armstrong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gordon Terpe + Sarah Bach3546% gamesnot enough data
Danielle Smith + Raymond Armstrong033 matchesnot enough data
Raymond Armstrong + Sarah Bach213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Mary Ritchie
37W–57L career · 6 lines in 2021
8%92%1%
4.19
4
Sarah Bach
59W–54L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Danielle Smith
59W–50L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
3.5
Gordon Terpe
19W–17L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jennifer Nielson
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Joe Salyer
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kenneth Sheehan
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Raymond Armstrong
12W–20L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.