Teams

DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS CW6.5B

2023 COMBO · Women 6.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-10-12vs CROW CANYON CC CW6.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Perkins / Kari Trimble vs Heather Brown / Shirley Xue6-0, 6-4
2023-09-23vs PLEASANTON CW6.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesCindy Turner / Kari Trimble vs Arianna Choing / Kayla Baier4-6, 1-6
2023-09-07vs FREMONT TC CW6.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesKari Trimble / Shannon Lynch vs Karen Ng / Judy Halper6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Abby Sexton
published 4
3.54
Shannon Lynch
published
3.48
Julie Gundermann
published
3.45
Cindy Turner
published 3.5
3.17
Hui Chen
published 3.5
3.14
Kari Trimble
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Michelle Weiss
published
3.10
Jennifer Scriabine
published
3.03
Diana Rosdahl
published 3
3.02
Mickie Kerr
published
3.00
Michelle Cooke
published
2.93
Florita Labrador
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3
2.85
Malou Matthew
published
2.85
Olga Keselman
published
2.80
Traci Rebiejo
published
2.67
Elaine Marshall
published 3
Leslie Souttaphonh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Weiss + Kari Trimble5158% games+5.0% vs expected
Michelle Weiss + Michelle Cooke213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abby Sexton
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Shannon Lynch
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Julie Gundermann
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Cindy Turner
19W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Hui Chen
2W–19L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17
Kari Trimble
44W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.14
Michelle Weiss
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.11
Jennifer Scriabine
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Diana Rosdahl
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.03
Mickie Kerr
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.02
Michelle Cooke
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Florita Labrador
69W–72L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
Malou Matthew
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
Olga Keselman
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
Traci Rebiejo
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Elaine Marshall
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
Leslie Souttaphonh
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.