Montana/Ponce/18&Over4.0W

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over · Women 4.0 - 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule3 played

2022-06-18vs TeamWon 4–0

W#1 DoublesMariafe Ponce / Elizabeth Lund vs Amy Berghold / Jennifer Schonhoff6-1, 3-6, 1-0

W#1 SinglesTessa Jochim vs Andrea Johnson6-1, 6-2

W#2 DoublesKatherine Gaddis / Cassie O'Bryant vs Anna Collins / Genevieve Martin6-3, 6-4

W#3 DoublesAnn Jackson / Anne Caprio vs Theresa Wise / Ann Chrisler6-1, 6-0

2022-06-18vs TeamWon 3–2

W#1 DoublesElizabeth Lund / Ann Jackson vs Erica Renslow / Theresa Wise6-1, 7-5

L#1 SinglesMae Alexander vs Dena Porter4-6, 2-6

W#2 DoublesMariafe Ponce / Katherine Gaddis vs Anna Collins / Kerry Corcoran6-4, 6-1

L#2 SinglesTaylor Erickson vs Elizabeth Matthews2-6, 7-5, 0-1

W#3 DoublesAnne Caprio / Olivia Gregory vs Amy Berghold / Susie Boyer6-2, 6-4

2022-06-16vs TeamLost 1–4

L#1 DoublesTaylor Erickson / Stephanie Chard vs Erica Renslow / Mary Kathryn Tennille4-6, 5-7

L#1 SinglesTessa Jochim vs Danielle Smith4-6, 1-6

W#2 DoublesKatherine Gaddis / Cassie O'Bryant vs Ann Chrisler / Genevieve Martin6-4, 6-1

L#2 SinglesMae Alexander vs Dena Porter3-6, 3-6

L#3 DoublesOlivia Gregory / Mariafe Ponce vs Amy Berghold / Jennifer Schonhoff2-6, 4-6

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings3 teams · Women 4.0 - 18 & Over

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1Montana/Ponce/18&Over4.0W	2	1	9	6	13	117
2Team	1	2	6	9	19	148
3FBI	0	0	0	0	0	0

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99

Elizabeth Lund

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.92

Mariafe Ponce

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.87

Mae Alexander

usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published —

3.42

Katherine Gaddis

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5

3.38

Anne Caprio

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

—

Ann Jackson

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

—

Cassie O'Bryant

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published —

—

Jennifer Schonhoff

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —

—

Mandy Smoker Broaddus

published —

—

Olivia Gregory

usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Taylor Erickson

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published —

—

Tessa Jochim

usually #1 Singles 100% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Erickson + Elizabeth Lund	7–0	76% games	+12.7% vs expected

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Lund

78W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022

<1%54%46%

3.99

Mariafe Ponce

30W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022

<1%72%28%

3.92

—

Mae Alexander

59W–39L career · 8 lines in 2022

<1%<1%>99%

3.87

3.5

Katherine Gaddis

16W–11L career · 5 lines in 2022

<1%73%27%

3.42

3.5

Anne Caprio

6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022

<1%82%18%

3.38

3.5

Ann Jackson

3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Cassie O'Bryant

8W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Jennifer Schonhoff

6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Mandy Smoker Broaddus

4W–6L career · no lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Olivia Gregory

14W–9L career · 7 lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Taylor Erickson

33W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Tessa Jochim

2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.