Teams

Team

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over · Women 4.0 - 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-06-18vs Montana/Ponce/18&Over4.0WLost 23
L#1 DoublesErica Renslow / Theresa Wise vs Elizabeth Lund / Ann Jackson1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesDena Porter vs Mae Alexander6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnna Collins / Kerry Corcoran vs Mariafe Ponce / Katherine Gaddis4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Matthews vs Taylor Erickson6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Berghold / Susie Boyer vs Anne Caprio / Olivia Gregory2-6, 4-6
2022-06-18vs Montana/Ponce/18&Over4.0WLost 04
L#1 DoublesAmy Berghold / Jennifer Schonhoff vs Mariafe Ponce / Elizabeth Lund1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnna Collins / Genevieve Martin vs Katherine Gaddis / Cassie O'Bryant3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Matthews vs Stephanie Chard2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Wise / Ann Chrisler vs Ann Jackson / Anne Caprio1-6, 0-6
2022-06-16vs Montana/Ponce/18&Over4.0WWon 41
W#1 DoublesErica Renslow / Mary Kathryn Tennille vs Taylor Erickson / Stephanie Chard6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesDanielle Smith vs Tessa Jochim6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnn Chrisler / Genevieve Martin vs Katherine Gaddis / Cassie O'Bryant4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesDena Porter vs Mae Alexander6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmy Berghold / Jennifer Schonhoff vs Olivia Gregory / Mariafe Ponce6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 4.0 - 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Ponce/18&Over4.0W219613117
2Team126919148
3FBI000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Danielle Smith
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Elizabeth Matthews
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
Erica Renslow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Anna Collins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.29
Dena Porter
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3.5
Ann Chrisler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Amy Berghold
usually #3 Doubles 22%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.15
Susie Boyer
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Jennifer Schonhoff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Kathryn Tennille
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tara Jensen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susie Boyer + Amy Berghold5450% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danielle Smith
59W–50L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Elizabeth Matthews
18W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Erica Renslow
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Anna Collins
20W–38L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Dena Porter
51W–63L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Ann Chrisler
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Amy Berghold
31W–32L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Susie Boyer
32W–47L career · 7 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Jennifer Schonhoff
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Kathryn Tennille
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Tara Jensen
16W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.