Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/Bastian

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W PM

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-29vs Liberty Park Tennis-TorresLost 01
L#2 DoublesShannon Knudsen / Stacy Higbee vs Collette Renstrom / Jennifer Wecker3-6, 0-6
2024-05-22vs Park City MARC-Smith/ByingtonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Tooley / Shannon Knudsen vs Linda Byington / Brenda Whicker2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStacy Higbee / Natalie Nguyen vs Nicole Leatham / Kendall Armstrong4-6, 2-6
2024-05-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Tooley / Shannon Knudsen vs Brenda Green / Emily Peterson7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-08Lost 01
L#2 DoublesShannon Knudsen / Jennifer Tooley vs Lexi Farr / Jessica Eckert3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-05-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Tooley / Shannon Knudsen vs Jacki Joseph / Brooke Curtis2-6, 3-6
2024-04-20vs Liberty Park Tennis-TaylorLost 01
L#3 DoublesStacy Higbee / Natalie Nguyen vs Jennifer Sweat / Malisa Bowen3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ashley Phyfe
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.34
Alejandra Gonzalez
usually #1 Singles 77%, also #2 Singles 15% · published 3.5
3.26
Meghan Kellner
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.22
Shannon Knudsen
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Jennifer Tooley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Kiki Frazier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.93
Miranda Tilley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3
2.86
Stephanie Cheng
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Gelyn Pauly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Carrie Larsen
published 3
2.65
KayeLynn BASTIAN
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.65
Delia Bayna
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.53
Stacy Higbee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mimi Franklin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

KayeLynn BASTIAN + Delia Bayna2738% games+2.3% vs expected
Delia Bayna + Stephanie Cheng3249% games+0.9% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Shannon Knudsen171450% games+0.8% vs expected
Delia Bayna + Alejandra Gonzalez2738% games+0.7% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Jennifer Tooley21044% games−0.0% vs expected
Gelyn Pauly + Miranda Tilley174139% games−0.1% vs expected
Meghan Kellner + Stephanie Cheng134 matchesnot enough data
Delia Bayna + Jennifer Tooley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ashley Phyfe
50W–20L career · 12 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Alejandra Gonzalez
76W–72L career · 13 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Meghan Kellner
46W–39L career · 11 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Shannon Knudsen
22W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Jennifer Tooley
197W–228L career · 12 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Kiki Frazier
13W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Miranda Tilley
35W–76L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Stephanie Cheng
8W–14L career · 9 lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.86
3
Gelyn Pauly
50W–93L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Carrie Larsen
49W–46L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
KayeLynn BASTIAN
209W–244L career · 19 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Delia Bayna
204W–265L career · 11 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
Stacy Higbee
17W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
Mimi Franklin
1W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.