Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Taylor

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W PM

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKaren Rozsa vs Courtney Thompson2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Sweat / Lauren Bryce vs Tricia Byrne / Becky Smith1-6, 1-6
2024-05-22Won 21
L#1 DoublesAlena Taylor / Malisa Bowen vs Lexi Farr / Muranda Barker2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMelissa Hofmann vs Jennifer Evans6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Sweat / Karen Rozsa vs Naomi Stroud-Peterson / Emily Matheson6-3, 7-5
2024-05-08vs Liberty Park Tennis-TorresSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa Hofmann / Maria Lombardi vs Catherine van Uitert / Shayna Dickey6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMalisa Bowen vs Amanda Moore3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-01Split 11
W#1 DoublesMalisa Bowen / Kelly Webster vs Debra Knowlton / Shauna Lake6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKaren Rozsa / Inga Nelson vs Yoko Walljasper / Lexie Williams2-6, 2-6
2024-04-24vs Liberty Park Tennis-TrentmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlena Taylor / Melissa Hofmann vs Kathleen Sorenson / Jan Broadbent7-6, 6-1
2024-04-20vs Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/BastianWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Sweat / Malisa Bowen vs Stacy Higbee / Natalie Nguyen6-3, 6-1
2024-04-10Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Hofmann / Bessy Nielson vs Summer Thomas / AMy Huish2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Bryce / Malisa Bowen vs Linda Byington / Robin Simmons4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Crystel Fox
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.41
Jeanette Shepard
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.38
Michelle Maxfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Lauren Bryce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Bessy Nielson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Melissa Hofmann
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.26
Alena Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
Angie Nelden
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Inga Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 36% · published 3.5
3.19
Kelly Webster
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.18
Jennie Bethers
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.16
Manal Hall
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.10
Maria Lombardi
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Carolyn Cottle
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.06
Mindi Paskins
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.00
Malisa Bowen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.96
Jennifer Sweat
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
2.78
Karen Rozsa
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alena Taylor + Melissa Hofmann3353% games+11.7% vs expected
Maria Lombardi + Jennie Bethers4159% games+10.6% vs expected
Michelle Maxfield + Melissa Hofmann5164% games+8.9% vs expected
Alena Taylor + Michelle Maxfield7850% games+7.3% vs expected
Manal Hall + Melissa Hofmann2352% games+7.2% vs expected
Bessy Nielson + Maria Lombardi5255% games+7.1% vs expected
Jeanette Shepard + Mindi Paskins12359% games+6.8% vs expected
Malisa Bowen + Alena Taylor181457% games+6.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Crystel Fox
151W–135L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
3.5
Jeanette Shepard
195W–143L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Michelle Maxfield
204W–139L career · 6 lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
3.38
Lauren Bryce
63W–65L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Bessy Nielson
213W–160L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
Melissa Hofmann
90W–57L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Alena Taylor
174W–200L career · 11 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Angie Nelden
80W–72L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Inga Nelson
162W–124L career · 11 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.19
Kelly Webster
197W–131L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Jennie Bethers
125W–120L career · 7 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Manal Hall
111W–167L career · 8 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Maria Lombardi
228W–163L career · 5 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Carolyn Cottle
113W–130L career · 11 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Mindi Paskins
238W–179L career · 10 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Malisa Bowen
182W–149L career · 5 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
Jennifer Sweat
135W–130L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Karen Rozsa
187W–205L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.