Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Trentman

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W PM

19 players · average NTRP 3.57 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesCelest Andrade / Jacki Joseph vs Lisa Beames / Kelly Wilcox6-3, 6-1
2024-05-22vs Liberty Park Tennis-LeikenLost 01
L#1 SinglesCelest Andrade vs Kristina Magee2-6, 2-6
2024-05-15Split 11
L#1 SinglesCelest Andrade vs Carolyn Schmitz4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBrooke Curtis / Hayley Shaffer vs Diane Poole / Maria Pettit7-5, 6-2
2024-05-08Won 20
W#2 DoublesJan Broadbent / Joey Archer vs Yoko Walljasper / Shauna Lake6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesGrace Lin vs Lora Lyon6-4, 7-5
2024-05-01Split 11
W#2 SinglesCelest Andrade vs Miranda Tilley6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLindsay Lafeen / Jan Broadbent vs Stephanie Cheng / Meghan Kellner7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2024-04-24vs Liberty Park Tennis-TaylorLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Sorenson / Jan Broadbent vs Alena Taylor / Melissa Hofmann6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCelest Andrade vs Jennie Bethers4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesHayley Shaffer vs Crystel Fox2-6, 2-6
2024-04-17Split 11
W#2 SinglesCelest Andrade vs Windsor Moore6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesHayley Shaffer / Celia Steele vs Heather Bratcher / Tricia Byrne0-6, 5-7
2024-04-10Split 11
W#1 SinglesCelest Andrade vs Chelsea Wood6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnn Trentman / Lindsay Lafeen vs Lexi Farr / Tori Locke4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Kala Riester
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.81
Celest Andrade
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.44
Jacki Joseph
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
3.37
Brooke Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
Jessica Johnson
published 3.5
3.21
Janine Sholeff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Ann Trentman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Jan Broadbent
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Celia Steele
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Terri Brunner
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.09
Lindsay Lafeen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Sharree Olsen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Carla Stoddard
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.06
Shelly Kemp
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.01
Hayley Shaffer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Grace Lin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Kathleen Sorenson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joey Archer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Larkin
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Trentman + Celia Steele7357% games+8.2% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Carla Stoddard11263% games+5.8% vs expected
Jacki Joseph + Brooke Curtis11754% games+4.7% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Terri Brunner9852% games+4.6% vs expected
Shelly Kemp + Brooke Curtis5357% games+3.0% vs expected
Shelly Kemp + Terri Brunner161748% games+2.0% vs expected
Janine Sholeff + Carla Stoddard5451% games+0.2% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Shelly Kemp454150% games−1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kala Riester
98W–23L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
4.07
4
Celest Andrade
106W–44L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
3.5
Jacki Joseph
227W–161L career · 13 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Brooke Curtis
148W–93L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Jessica Johnson
no matches on record · type M · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Janine Sholeff
101W–94L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Ann Trentman
186W–245L career · 16 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Jan Broadbent
21W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Celia Steele
47W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Terri Brunner
142W–142L career · 7 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Lindsay Lafeen
32W–45L career · 2 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.09
Sharree Olsen
42W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Carla Stoddard
124W–150L career · 10 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
Shelly Kemp
141W–135L career · 7 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Hayley Shaffer
77W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.01
3.5
Grace Lin
33W–42L career · 1 line in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.98
Kathleen Sorenson
46W–94L career · 1 line in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.94
Joey Archer
32W–54L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Larkin
93W–206L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.