Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Torres

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W PM

16 players · average NTRP 3.42 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Moore / Catherine van Uitert vs Stephanie Cheng / Meghan Kellner6-2, 6-3
2024-05-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesShayna Dickey / Shannon Halverson vs Terri Brunner / Shelly Kemp0-6, 3-6
2024-05-08vs Liberty Park Tennis-TaylorLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine van Uitert / Shayna Dickey vs Melissa Hofmann / Maria Lombardi3-6, 1-6
2024-04-24Won 20
W#1 SinglesCatherine van Uitert vs Kelly Wilcox6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShannon Halverson / Collette Renstrom vs Jennifer Evans / Michelle Lynn Maxfield7-5, 6-4
2024-04-17vs Liberty Park Tennis-LeikenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCatherine van Uitert / Jennifer Wecker vs Lisa Ewing / Kristen Treanor6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesShannon Halverson vs Cozette Caron2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Alexa Saltzman
usually #1 Singles 65%, also #2 Singles 24% · published 4
3.52
Kassie Torres
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.43
Carolyn Schmitz
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.40
Catherine van Uitert
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Jennifer Wecker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.22
Jamie DeLong
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.22
Collette Renstrom
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.17
Amanda Moore
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.03
Diane Poole
usually #2 Singles 27%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.93
Rikke Phinney
published
2.90
Maria Pettit
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.85
Shannon Halverson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.83
Davinia Lyon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.66
Caryl Fletcher
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Molly Adams
published
Shayna Dickey
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Adams + Kassie Torres7355% games+11.8% vs expected
Kassie Torres + Jamie DeLong121053% games+6.7% vs expected
Maria Pettit + Jamie DeLong4257% games+3.2% vs expected
Shannon Halverson + Collette Renstrom4445% games+2.8% vs expected
Carolyn Schmitz + Amanda Moore3348% games+2.1% vs expected
Caryl Fletcher + Maria Pettit18854% games−0.5% vs expected
Jamie DeLong + Alexa Saltzman4457% games−2.9% vs expected
Maria Pettit + Davinia Lyon2439% games−7.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexa Saltzman
126W–65L career · 17 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Kassie Torres
180W–119L career · 11 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Carolyn Schmitz
40W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Catherine van Uitert
50W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Jennifer Wecker
92W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Jamie DeLong
171W–129L career · 14 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Collette Renstrom
60W–76L career · 7 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Amanda Moore
53W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Diane Poole
191W–165L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
Rikke Phinney
44W–49L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Maria Pettit
188W–196L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Shannon Halverson
25W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Davinia Lyon
92W–68L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Caryl Fletcher
142W–122L career · 9 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
2.66
Molly Adams
83W–53L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shayna Dickey
22W–54L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.