Teams

Sunpro-Jensen

2021 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 3.5W

8 players · average NTRP 3.36 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-18vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-HandlonLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesJennifer Napierski / TRACY PADGETT vs Shoeleh Assemi / Anne Young3-6, 0-6
2021-12-11vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-Bellina/CrootWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesAshley Bailey / TRACY PADGETT vs Lola Andre / Charli Franco6-3, 6-2
2021-12-04vs Ivory Ridge-Patch/JohnsonWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesHaley Skinner / TRACY PADGETT vs Marilyn Patch / Melissa Despain7-6, 6-4
L#2 Female DoublesTRACY PADGETT / Tina Taylor vs Sara Ray / Kathrine Wright4-6, 1-6
2021-11-13vs Cottonwood Club-Kieffer/AnnunziataLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesRobyn Cardon / Jennifer Napierski vs Angela Bleak / Heather Sliwa4-6, 0-6
2021-11-06vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-HandlonLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesMelissa Reoch / Robyn Cardon vs Shoeleh Assemi / Anne Young1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Jennifer Napierski
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
Ashley Bailey
published 3.5
3.04
TRACY PADGETT
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #2 Female Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Cherylin Winkel
published 3.5
2.83
Choon Whittle
published 3
2.83
Carrie Jensen
published 3
2.75
Melissa Reoch
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
Robyn Cardon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Jensen + Melissa Reoch6263% games+10.2% vs expected
Carrie Jensen + Cherylin Winkel161056% games+4.5% vs expected
Melissa Reoch + Cherylin Winkel2347% games−2.2% vs expected
Ashley Bailey + TRACY PADGETT1440% games−16.0% vs expected
Jennifer Napierski + Ashley Bailey4161% gamesnot enough data
Robyn Cardon + Cherylin Winkel2346% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Napierski + TRACY PADGETT314 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Jensen + TRACY PADGETT213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jennifer Napierski
124W–52L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Ashley Bailey
58W–48L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
TRACY PADGETT
105W–91L career · 4 lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Cherylin Winkel
112W–142L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Choon Whittle
14W–23L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Carrie Jensen
138W–169L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Melissa Reoch
90W–77L career · 1 line in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Robyn Cardon
14W–24L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.