Teams

Heberle 3.5 40s Tues

2023 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-02vs Manning 3.5 40sLost 01
L#3 DoublesBlythe Murphy / Allison Spooner vs Jill Elam / Angel Smith7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-18vs McPherson 3.5 40s Tues PMWon 10
W#2 DoublesBlythe Murphy / Stephanie Adams vs Jennifer Russell / Shannon Hughes6-0, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-04vs Linden-Stichter 3.5 40 TuesLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeirdre Hjelt / Blythe Murphy vs Suzanne Andia / Robin Pierson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-03-14vs Manning 3.5 40sLost 01
L#2 DoublesBlythe Murphy / Thais Warwar vs Krisla Berreth / Gladys Dunn3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Deirdre Hjelt
published 3.5
3.36
Blythe Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Thais Warwar
published
3.11
Allison Spooner
published 3.5
3.05
Frida Nordmark
published 3.5
2.98
Angela Greene
published 3
2.97
Andrea Hayes
published 3
2.95
Teresa Sagraves
published
2.94
Stephanie Adams
published
2.54
Susan Brodeur
published
Beverly Crisp
published 2.5
Meredith Heberle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Blythe Murphy + Thais Warwar314 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Hayes + Teresa Sagraves303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deirdre Hjelt
54W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Blythe Murphy
127W–108L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.36
Thais Warwar
30W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Allison Spooner
8W–19L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Frida Nordmark
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Angela Greene
22W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Andrea Hayes
19W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
Teresa Sagraves
22W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
Stephanie Adams
23W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.94
Susan Brodeur
2W–20L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Beverly Crisp
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meredith Heberle
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.