← Search

Frida Nordmark

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
OAK RIDGE, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 73W–66L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history139 matches
L
2026-07-21 · LeFevre 40s 3.5 Mixed Tues P · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffery Ward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · Herron/Nutt 18s 4.0 Mixed Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Johan Nordmark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-14 · LeFevre 40s 3.5 Mixed Tues P · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arick Tuhro mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-30 · LeFevre 40s 3.5 Mixed Tues P · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gene LeFevre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · LeFevre 40s 3.5 Mixed Tues P · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Horan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · Herron/Nutt 18s 4.0 Mixed Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Johan Nordmark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-05 · Pitts 40s 3.5W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Geer
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-07 · Pitts 40s 3.5W Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thais Warwar
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-24 · Pitts 40s 3.5W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Price
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-09 · Reynolds 40+ 3.5W Wed PM · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-02 · Reynolds 40+ 3.5W Wed PM · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-01 · Miller 40+ 3.5 Mixed Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Wasserman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
68.8%
22W–10L · 61.6% of games
3.5
35.6%
16W–29L · 42.7% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.1% of games
6.5
40%
8W–12L · 48.1% of games
3.5mixed
30%
3W–7L · 35.7% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.4% of games
7.0mixed
92.3%
12W–1L · 67.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
23 matches
#3 Singles
6%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams