Teams

Players Club / Rose

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-02-28vs Isles Of Collier / M.YoungWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Dubbe / Clare Hart vs Lorraine Bigelow / Pamela Ginzburg6-2, 7-5
2025-02-21vs Fiddlers Creek / McNamaraWon 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Vermillion / Judith Cappello vs Sue Oliver / Marybeth Ray5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesGina Dubbe / Marcia Teetor vs Megan Zimmerman / Michele Pallone1-6, 2-6
2025-01-31vs Fiddlers Creek / FarnhamLost 01
L#1 DoublesGina Dubbe / Linda Vermillion vs Odette Kardek / Kerry Turner1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-01-24vs Players Club - J. DuffyLost 01
L#3 DoublesJudith Cappello / Gina Dubbe vs Julie Pearson / Julie WIDEMAN3-6, 3-6
2025-01-20vs Isles Of Collier / M.YoungLost 01
L#1 DoublesGina Dubbe / Linda Vermillion vs Susan Ward / Suzanne O'Neill7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-01-10vs Hammock Bay / TrzcinskiWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Dubbe / Linda Vermillion vs Jacquie Currie / Susan Gruber2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Gina Dubbe
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.84
Diane Sullivan
published 3
2.82
2.77
Clare Hart
published 3
2.75
Judith Cappello
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Janet Olliges
published
Kara Boudreau
published
Linda Vermillion
published
Marcia Teetor
published
Marianne Becker
published
Melanie Rose
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Cappello + Gina Dubbe7757% gamesnot enough data
Judith Cappello + Marianne Becker5257% gamesnot enough data
Marcia Teetor + Clare Hart134 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Rose + Janet Olliges123 matchesnot enough data
Linda Vermillion + Elizabeth Decamara213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Gina Dubbe
61W–58L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Diane Sullivan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
Elizabeth Decamara
12W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Clare Hart
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Judith Cappello
55W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Janet Olliges
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kara Boudreau
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Vermillion
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marcia Teetor
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marianne Becker
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melanie Rose
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.