Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Utgaard

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.5W AM

16 players · average NTRP 4.31 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-08-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Jensen Clark / Lisa Garland vs Laura Bailey / Julie Winterton6-7, 4-6
2022-07-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJill Jensen Clark / Karina Herman vs Lynette Duran / Linda Marz3-6, 4-6
2022-07-18vs Sunpro-AllenLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Eischeid / Jill Jensen Clark vs Kristi Dial / Kimberly Clawson5-7, 3-6
2022-06-20Lost 01
L#2 DoublesUi Afualo / Jill Jensen Clark vs Lori Keenan / Tanya Conrad5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Laura Savage
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
4.43
Kimberly Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.35
Stephanie Tonin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.28
Amy Woolley
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
Christina Mooney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.25
Christina Eischeid
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
4.23
Tracey Valentine
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 13% · published
4.17
Arashan Heikkila
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
Karina Herman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.88
Kristi Roggensack
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.78
Ui Afualo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Renee Utgaard
published 4
Jill Jensen Clark
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
LIZ CARLSON
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Leslie Barrowes
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Lisa Garland
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Tonin + Tracey Valentine9074% games+11.2% vs expected
Kimberly Simpson + Christina Eischeid11263% games+7.8% vs expected
Stephanie Tonin + Kimberly Simpson19960% games+7.1% vs expected
Renee Utgaard + Ui Afualo4260% games+5.9% vs expected
Stephanie Tonin + Laura Savage6165% games+5.2% vs expected
Arashan Heikkila + Tracey Valentine10359% games+3.4% vs expected
Stephanie Tonin + Christina Eischeid15758% games+2.8% vs expected
Renee Utgaard + Laura Savage6356% games+2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Savage
116W–64L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
4.46
Kimberly Simpson
144W–57L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Stephanie Tonin
159W–95L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Amy Woolley
192W–98L career · 9 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Christina Mooney
60W–46L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Christina Eischeid
124W–57L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
4.25
Tracey Valentine
97W–60L career · 8 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Arashan Heikkila
188W–76L career · 9 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
Karina Herman
73W–68L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
Kristi Roggensack
126W–91L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Ui Afualo
155W–149L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Renee Utgaard
156W–111L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Jill Jensen Clark
22W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
LIZ CARLSON
45W–50L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Leslie Barrowes
31W–64L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Garland
13W–6L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.