Teams

CV-Mission Hills/Moskowitz

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-04-07vs CV-LLWx-Deep Canyon/B StoneLost 02
L#2 DoublesJill Goldman / Rebecca Ringer vs Lea Poirier / Susan Sacks5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAgnes Hoffman / Linda Moskowitz vs Darlene Dagan / Blair Stone1-6, 4-6
2025-03-31vs CV-Indian Ridge CC/MorinWon 10
W#2 DoublesRebecca Ringer / Jill Goldman vs Barbara Johns / Barbara Vogel6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Moskowitz / Rebecca Ringer vs Katie Buechel / Susan Haley7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Moskowitz / Ann Tennyson vs Suzy Skone / Barbara Cassuto4-6, 4-6
2025-02-24vs CV-Sun City PD/Oswald & N CaudillLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Moskowitz / Agnes Hoffman vs Chris Mckown / Cheryl Yasis6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Ringer / Jill Goldman vs Audrey Wu / Teresa Makhijani6-2, 6-2
2025-02-10vs CV-Silver Sands/N Jacoby & K BrownLost 01
L#3 DoublesEllen Boyer / Rebecca Ringer vs Suzanne Mann / Kate Allard4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLinda Moskowitz / Jayne Spector vs Carole Huntley / Mei Leckenby4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-27vs CV-Del Webb Rancho Mirage/C WrightLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarta Mykytyn-Hill / Linda Moskowitz vs Carol Cornell / Carolyn Wright1-6, 6-7
2025-01-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRebecca Ringer / Ellen Boyer vs Barbara Wood / Sonia Gleadle5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEllen Boyer / Rebecca Ringer vs Suzanne Young / Lisa Hayes6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Katie Scullion
published
3.36
Ann Tennyson
published 3.5
3.33
Rebecca Ringer
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.17
Jill Goldman
published
3.15
Shelley Lynch
published
2.99
Linda Moskowitz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ellen Boyer
published
Marta Mykytyn-Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Moskowitz + Rebecca Ringer2738% gamesnot enough data
Katie Scullion + Shelley Lynch3248% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Scullion
20W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Ann Tennyson
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Rebecca Ringer
63W–53L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Jill Goldman
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Shelley Lynch
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Linda Moskowitz
39W–81L career · 6 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Ellen Boyer
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marta Mykytyn-Hill
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.