Teams

CV-Rancho La Quinta/E Cooley & J Wright

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesKatie Buechel / Stacie Hogan vs Linda Martinez / Monica Solis4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElaine Reddick-Cooley / Sarah Angus vs Carole Huntley / Sue Velarde6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristina Bear / Jill Day vs Lisa Hill / Stephania Denton6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJina Lorati / Jill Day vs Tami DeVita / Debra Creem2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-17vs CV-Mission Hills/MoskowitzLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrea Holmes / Jina Lorati vs Ann Tennyson / Jill Goldman1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesSarah Angus / Kathleen Lewis vs Carolyn Sewell / Brenda Ouimet3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJina Lorati / Janice Creager vs Judy Warner / Barb Stoliker2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-20Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Haley / Jina Lorati vs Cheryl Yasis / Denise Green6-7, 0-6
2025-01-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKathleen Lewis / Christina Bear vs Karen Brown / Irene Pelletier7-6, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Hilary Quinn
published
3.46
Jill Wright
published
3.37
Christina Bear
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Katie Buechel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Elaine Reddick-Cooley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Jina Lorati
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Janice Creager
published
Kathleen Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
MaryLynn Murphy
published
Sarah Angus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stacie Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Haley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Wright + Hilary Quinn4156% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Angus + Elaine Reddick-Cooley224 matchesnot enough data
Elaine Reddick-Cooley + Hilary Quinn134 matchesnot enough data
Christina Bear + Kathleen Lewis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hilary Quinn
21W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
Jill Wright
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Christina Bear
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Katie Buechel
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Elaine Reddick-Cooley
25W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jina Lorati
20W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.89
Janice Creager
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Lewis
17W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
MaryLynn Murphy
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Angus
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stacie Hogan
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Haley
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.