← Search

Kathleen Lewis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 17W–16L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history33 matches
W
2026-01-26 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Cooley & Wright · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Bear
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-01-12 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Cooley & Wright · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Bear
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-05 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Cooley & Wright · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Bear
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-03-03 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/E Cooley & J Wright · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Angus
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-01-25 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Young · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Boutros
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-01-06 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/E Cooley & J Wright · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Bear
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2024-10-12 · BC-Watson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pauline Snowden
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2022-10-22 · BC-Vintage-Meeks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Snyder
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2022-10-16 · BC-Vintage-Meeks · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Gaan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
L
2022-10-01 · BC-Vintage-Meeks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Smallwood - *
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-6
L
2022-09-11 · BC-Vintage-Meeks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy WebberMeeks
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2020-02-29 · BC-McEachran · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.5% of games
7.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 51.4% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal