Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Leishman/Ewing

2022 Fall Outdoor League-Weekday · 3.5W

16 players · average NTRP 3.65 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-18vs Wasatch Rec Center-Ramage/ParkerWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Ewing / Allison Leishman vs Katri Koehle / Lindsey Ramage6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Ewing / Lezlae Grubb vs Mary Jane Swalberg / Nooshin Prasthofer7-5, 6-2
2022-10-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Sliwa / Ann Trentman vs Michelle Fowkes / Lisa Moncur7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-09-27vs Sports Mall-Hall/WeaverWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Sliwa / Shelly Kemp vs Megan Reardon / Manal Hall2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Ewing / Jennie Stacey vs Brooke Rollins / JaNean Nelson6-3, 7-6
2022-09-20vs Park City MARC-Smith/KernLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Trentman / Shelly Kemp vs Kiki Frazier / Samantha Levin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHeather Sliwa / Terri Brunner vs Kristi Johnson / Cathy Siegal4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#4 DoublesKatie Winson / Lezlae Grubb vs Marcey Goldner / Marie Jackson6-4, 7-5
2022-09-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShelly Kemp / Tracee Kemp vs Katie Swensen / Kim Cronin2-6, 1-6
2022-08-30vs Ivory Ridge-Adams/RoperLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Sparrer / Lisa Ewing vs Heather Cottrell / Jamie Harris7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLezlae Grubb vs Cecia Croft2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShelly Kemp / Ann Trentman vs Kat Fuller / Trisha Cutrer6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2022-08-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesShelly Kemp / Ann Trentman vs Deyce Peterson / Lisa Wade6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Whitney Fautin
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.72
Mithona Nielsen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.33
Lisa Ewing
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Heather Sliwa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Jennie Stacey
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Ann Trentman
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.13
Terri Brunner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Shelly Kemp
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.00
Allison Leishman
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Katie Winson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.89
Kadee Wolfgram
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Nancy Sparrer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Lezlae Grubb
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nicole Fisher
usually #4 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Tracee Kemp
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Valeriya Vasenina
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mithona Nielsen + Nicole Fisher3256% games+14.1% vs expected
Kadee Wolfgram + Whitney Fautin9361% games+13.9% vs expected
Shelly Kemp + Heather Sliwa7063% games+7.6% vs expected
Jennie Stacey + Allison Leishman4551% games+6.7% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Lisa Ewing5257% games+6.2% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Terri Brunner9852% games+4.6% vs expected
Terri Brunner + Heather Sliwa231253% games+3.9% vs expected
Mithona Nielsen + Kadee Wolfgram5745% games+3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Whitney Fautin
191W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4
Mithona Nielsen
113W–116L career · 10 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Lisa Ewing
122W–123L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Heather Sliwa
82W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jennie Stacey
153W–129L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Ann Trentman
186W–245L career · 9 lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Terri Brunner
142W–142L career · 3 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Shelly Kemp
141W–135L career · 5 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Allison Leishman
132W–210L career · 4 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
3.5
Katie Winson
128W–124L career · 10 lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.93
3.5
Kadee Wolfgram
97W–84L career · 4 lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.89
3.5
Nancy Sparrer
28W–101L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.88
Lezlae Grubb
39W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicole Fisher
102W–64L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracee Kemp
39W–100L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Valeriya Vasenina
14W–16L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.