Teams

Burnstein/Nashville

2023 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Monday AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Stephanie Baas
published
3.62
Jessica Dye
published
3.58
Julie Burnstein
published
3.53
Whitney Conyers
published
3.49
Misty Holladay
published
3.48
3.39
Annie Adler
published 3.5
3.23
Paige Patton
published
3.22
Lucy Duvall
published
3.19
3.19
Virginia Mazzoni
published
3.15
Suzanne Smothers
published
3.13
Kate Long
published
3.00
Kacee McGuigan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Burnstein + Whitney Conyers5453% games+1.9% vs expected
Annie Adler + Misty Holladay3259% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Stringfellow + Julie Burnstein213 matchesnot enough data
Annie Adler + Virginia Mazzoni303 matchesnot enough data
Kate Long + Paige Patton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Baas
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.66
Jessica Dye
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.62
Julie Burnstein
33W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.58
Whitney Conyers
25W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.53
Misty Holladay
18W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
4
Ashley Stringfellow
15W–5L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.48
3.5
Annie Adler
13W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
Paige Patton
20W–17L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Lucy Duvall
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Mary Margaret Behncke
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Virginia Mazzoni
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Suzanne Smothers
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.15
Kate Long
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy
29W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kacee McGuigan
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.