Teams

NJ GOLD

2025 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · MEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-09vs WP-C NAVYLost 01
L#1 Male DoublesMichael Reisbeck / Alan Caffey vs Pawel Mankowski / Brett Denkler7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2025-07-02vs NJ REDSplit 11
L#1 Male DoublesMichael Reisbeck / Jesse Ohlman vs Alan Shkolnikov / Alexander Manwaring2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 Male SinglesMark Bauerle vs Jeremy Hand6-4, 6-2
2025-06-25vs MC GREENLost 01
L#1 Male DoublesKeith Orgel / Alan Caffey vs Jules Perryman / Brett Gedvilas7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-18vs LTC-D NAVYWon 10
W#2 Male SinglesAlan Caffey vs Evan Beale7-6, 6-3
2025-06-11vs PRKR GREENLost 01
L#2 Male SinglesAlan Caffey vs Tyler McFarland3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-06-04vs MC YELLOWWon 20
W#1 Male DoublesMark Bauerle / Jesse Ohlman vs Adam Kemp / Lee Yarbrough7-6, 6-1
W#1 Male SinglesAlan Caffey vs Paul Gruszecki2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · MEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PRKR GREEN6114717160
2LTC-D NAVY6114717178
3NJ RED4312921182
4WP-C NAVY43111023182
5MC YELLOW2471123160
6MC GREEN2591226193
7LTC-M NAVY1551328196
8NJ GOLD1661532222

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Mark Bauerle
usually #1 Male Doubles 50%, also #2 Male Singles 50% · published 4
4.02
3.89
Michael Reisbeck
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Keith Orgel
published
3.71
John Fruit
published
3.56
Alan Caffey
usually #2 Male Singles 40%, also #1 Male Doubles 40% · published 4
Jesse Ohlman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jesse Ohlman + Michael Reisbeck404 matchesnot enough data
Mark Bauerle + Michael Reisbeck303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mark Bauerle
89W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Bradley Schwoegler
34W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Michael Reisbeck
124W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Keith Orgel
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Christopher Amezcua
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Fruit
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Alan Caffey
15W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Jesse Ohlman
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.