Teams

NJ RED

2025 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · MEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-16vs PRKR GREENSplit 11
L#1 Male DoublesThomas Cauchi / Alexander Manwaring vs Andrew Dodson / Eric Dao1-6, 4-6
W#1 Male SinglesHenry Carson vs Ryan Griffin7-6, 7-6
2025-07-09vs MC YELLOWWon 10
W#1 Male DoublesAlexander Manwaring / Alan Shkolnikov vs Adam Kemp / Lorne Fultonberg6-3, 7-5
2025-07-02vs NJ GOLDWon 20
W#1 Male DoublesAlan Shkolnikov / Alexander Manwaring vs Michael Reisbeck / Jesse Ohlman6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 Male SinglesThomas Cauchi vs Bradley Schwoegler2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-25vs WP-C NAVYWon 10
W#1 Male DoublesThomas Cauchi / Henry Carson vs Chad Whitmer / Robert Shepard6-2, 6-3
2025-06-18vs LTC-M NAVYLost 02
L#1 Male DoublesAlan Shkolnikov / Alexander Manwaring vs John Crook / John Guillod4-6, 3-6
L#1 Male SinglesHenry Carson vs Curtis Cho6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-16vs LTC-D NAVYSplit 11
L#1 Male SinglesThomas Cauchi vs Kaillin Reid2-6, 3-6
W#2 Male SinglesHenry Carson vs Colin John6-1, 6-4
2025-06-11vs MC GREENWon 10
W#1 Male DoublesThomas Cauchi / Jeremy Hand vs Jules Perryman / Joe Rosen7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · MEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PRKR GREEN6114717160
2LTC-D NAVY6114717178
3NJ RED4312921182
4WP-C NAVY43111023182
5MC YELLOW2471123160
6MC GREEN2591226193
7LTC-M NAVY1551328196
8NJ GOLD1661532222

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Henry Carson
usually #1 Male Singles 50%, also #2 Male Singles 25% · published 4
3.92
Thomas Cauchi
usually #1 Male Doubles 60%, also #1 Male Singles 40% · published 4
3.88
Andrew James
published 4
3.81
Alan Shkolnikov
published 4
3.69
Alexander Manwaring
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Jeremy Hand
published
3.67
Tom Fulton
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Henry Carson
80W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Thomas Cauchi
92W–57L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Andrew James
19W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Alan Shkolnikov
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Alexander Manwaring
44W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Jeremy Hand
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Tom Fulton
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.