Teams

WP-C NAVY

2025 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · MEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-20vs MC YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 Male DoublesRobert Shepard / Chad Whitmer vs Lorne Fultonberg / Martijn Letteboer4-6, 1-6
W#2 Male SinglesPawel Mankowski vs Paul Gruszecki6-4, 6-0
2025-07-09vs NJ GOLDWon 10
W#1 Male DoublesPawel Mankowski / Brett Denkler vs Michael Reisbeck / Alan Caffey6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2025-06-25vs NJ REDLost 01
L#1 Male DoublesChad Whitmer / Robert Shepard vs Thomas Cauchi / Henry Carson2-6, 3-6
2025-06-16vs LTC-D NAVYSplit 11
L#1 Male DoublesLionel Pomerantz / Chad Whitmer vs Ian Lane / Colin John3-6, 3-6
W#2 Male SinglesPawel Mankowski vs Jonathan Liauw6-2, 6-3
2025-06-04vs PRKR GREENLost 01
L#1 Male DoublesEvan Glasner / Pawel Mankowski vs Jeff Aberle / Andrew Dodson6-7, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · MEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PRKR GREEN6114717160
2LTC-D NAVY6114717178
3NJ RED4312921182
4WP-C NAVY43111023182
5MC YELLOW2471123160
6MC GREEN2591226193
7LTC-M NAVY1551328196
8NJ GOLD1661532222

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Pawel Mankowski
usually #1 Male Doubles 50%, also #2 Male Singles 50% · published 4
4.08
Evan Glasner
published
4.07
Jake Hugenberg
published
3.85
Kirk Arza
published
3.82
Chad Whitmer
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Robert Shepard
published
3.65
Lionel Pomerantz
published
3.25
Brett Denkler
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lionel Pomerantz + Chad Whitmer314 matchesnot enough data
Evan Glasner + Pawel Mankowski404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Pawel Mankowski
50W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
4.14
Evan Glasner
15W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.08
Jake Hugenberg
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
Kirk Arza
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.85
4
Chad Whitmer
106W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Robert Shepard
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Lionel Pomerantz
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Brett Denkler
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.