Teams

Florida/Rodriguez/TriLevel18&Over4.5W

2024 Alachua Trilevel 18 & Over · 4.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-14vs DB - LouisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Banes / Emily Dace vs Sheena Prasad / Preetika Pai7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMargot Maurer / Jennifer Hitchcock vs Marlene Townsend / Anita Rajasekhar2-6, 2-6
2024-10-05vs DB - LigmanSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSamantha Penhale / Wheeler Crawford vs Charlene Frazer / Tammy Miller6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMargot Maurer / Jennifer Hitchcock vs Lindsay Akri / Susan Chase4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-04vs JTC - NeelandsWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Banes / MEGAN MOLYNEUX vs Jenny Neelands / Jackie Sirmopoulos6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSamantha Penhale / Rachel Rodriguez vs Julie Sager / Irina Madorsky6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Dickerson / Rhoda Wilburn vs Kelsy Hill / Judith Bertran6-4, 6-0
2024-10-03vs DB - LouisWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Dickerson / Rhoda Wilburn vs Ashley Spink / Abigail Foster6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Kelly Banes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Emily Dace
published
3.94
Wheeler Crawford
published
3.86
Elizabeth Dickerson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Samantha Penhale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Rhoda Wilburn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Jennifer Hitchcock
published
3.19
Margot Maurer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Dickerson + Rhoda Wilburn7161% games+8.4% vs expected
Kelly Banes + Emily Dace314 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Dickerson + Wheeler Crawford224 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Banes + Rhoda Wilburn303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kelly Banes
136W–60L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
4.36
Emily Dace
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
Wheeler Crawford
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Elizabeth Dickerson
264W–115L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Samantha Penhale
51W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Rhoda Wilburn
86W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Jennifer Hitchcock
15W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Margot Maurer
51W–79L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.