Teams

DB - Louis

2024 Alachua Trilevel 18 & Over · 4.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#2 DoublesMadison Sagas / Lynn Godwin vs Rachel Rodriguez / Wheeler Crawford4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMarlene Townsend / Anita Rajasekhar vs Margot Maurer / Jennifer Hitchcock6-2, 6-2
2024-10-05vs JTC - NeelandsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMadison Sagas / Dawn Dean vs Julie Sager / Irina Madorsky6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAshley Spink / Marlene Townsend vs Judith Bertran / Mara Rodriguez2-6, 1-6
2024-10-04vs DB - LigmanWon 21
L#1 DoublesNikki Perrino / Preetika Pai vs Paige Nicholson / Alaina Gray3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLynn Godwin / Madison Sagas vs Heather Gibson / Tammy Miller7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarlene Townsend / Anita Rajasekhar vs Susan Chase / Christine Emery6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesPreetika Pai / Nikki Perrino vs MEGAN MOLYNEUX / Tara Johnson6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDawn Dean / Lynn Godwin vs Rachel Rodriguez / Wheeler Crawford1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAshley Spink / Abigail Foster vs Elizabeth Dickerson / Rhoda Wilburn7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Nikki Perrino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Madison Sagas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.75
Anita Rajasekhar
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Dawn Dean
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Lynn Godwin
published
3.46
Ashley Spink
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Marlene Townsend
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Abigail Foster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marlene Townsend + Anita Rajasekhar4157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nikki Perrino
57W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
4.33
4
Madison Sagas
47W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Anita Rajasekhar
130W–74L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Dawn Dean
44W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.65
Lynn Godwin
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Ashley Spink
133W–63L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
Marlene Townsend
181W–153L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Abigail Foster
8W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.