Teams

Cottonwood Club-Eischeid

2023 ITA Mixed 18 & Over · mixed 8.5 18 & over

15 players · average NTRP 4.35 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-09-16vs Wasatch Hills-KesterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesOlivia Hu / Connor Burke vs Kristi Warren / Jamel Cash6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAdrienne Davis / Joseph Nash vs Carlene Kemp / Ryan Scrivano6-2, 7-6
2023-09-08vs Park City MARC-Ward/PettigrewLost 03
L#1 DoublesOlivia Hu / Connor Burke vs Craig Zimmerman / Phoebe Hailey1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMilo Headden / Heather Foy vs Libble Ginster / Ben Ginster6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristina Eischeid / Peter Eischeid vs Brian Schulz / Lisa Caldwell3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 DoublesPeter Eischeid / Christina Eischeid vs Jane McQuade / Tony Lew0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Davis / Connor Burke vs CHRISTOPHER HO / Casey Pickett6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoseph Nash / Heather Foy vs Ui Afualo / Trinh Tran7-5, 6-4
2023-08-25vs Wasatch Hills-KesterLost 12
L#1 DoublesAhmed Mohammed / Lindsay Knight vs Kristi Warren / Jamel Cash6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Simpson / Peter Eischeid vs Nicholas Mihalyi / Stacie Johnson4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesOlivia Hu / Austin Kirk vs Christopher Ahearn / Carlene Kemp3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-08-09vs Liberty Park Tennis-JohnsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesMilo Headden / Kara Sargent vs Alex McCray / Teisa Linscott6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesChristina Eischeid / Peter Eischeid vs Lisa Sterbenz / JJ Amaya6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Foy / Chris Bleak vs Heidi Gordon / Floyd Gordon6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2023-07-29vs Liberty Park Tennis-JohnsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Davis / Ahmed Mohammed vs Arthur Miyazaki / Janelle Pulley1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Foy / Junhyon Park vs Ashley Miyazaki / Floyd Gordon1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRegan Tieff / Milo Headden vs Heather Paddock / Cole Paterson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesOlivia Hu / Connor Burke vs Malika Maxwell / Quinn Champion5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAhmed Mohammed / Adrienne Davis vs Gabriel Pilones / Jordyn Parry4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRegan Tieff / Milo Headden vs Catherine Bliss / Bode Widerburg6-7, 4-6
2023-07-14vs Park City MARC-Ward/PettigrewLost 12
L#1 DoublesConnor Burke / Olivia Hu vs Taylor Smith / Libble Ginster3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChris Bleak / Kimberly Simpson vs Scott Hafen / Kathy Sly4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoseph Nash / Christina Eischeid vs Chad Rexroad / Bobbie Miles6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for mixed 8.5 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ahmed Mohammed
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Austin Kirk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Connor Burke
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.22
Christina Eischeid
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.20
Kimberly Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.07
Kara Sargent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Heather Foy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.02
Chris Bleak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.86
Lindsay Knight
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Adrienne Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.81
Olivia Hu
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.73
Regan Tieff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Peter Eischeid
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Joseph Nash
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Junhyon Park
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Simpson + Peter Eischeid4353% games+4.9% vs expected
Peter Eischeid + Christina Eischeid12853% games+3.0% vs expected
Connor Burke + Olivia Hu1441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ahmed Mohammed
24W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Austin Kirk
23W–9L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Connor Burke
3W–7L career · type M · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Christina Eischeid
124W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
Kimberly Simpson
136W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
4.20
4.5
Kara Sargent
56W–33L career · 1 line in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.07
4.5
Heather Foy
59W–82L career · 4 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
4.04
4
Chris Bleak
159W–93L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
4.02
Lindsay Knight
105W–41L career · 1 line in 2023
1%84%15%
3.86
4.5
Adrienne Davis
56W–59L career · 8 lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.85
Olivia Hu
72W–65L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.81
4
Regan Tieff
196W–107L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Peter Eischeid
82W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.54
Joseph Nash
39W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Junhyon Park
8W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.