Teams

SPANISH OAKS

2025 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 18 & OVER · 3.5 WOMEN- 18 & OVER

15 players · average NTRP 3.22 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-05-31vs SUMMERLIN ARBORSLost 14
L#1 DoublesChandra VanPaepeghem / Allison Ibarguen vs Jerri Blutman / Sarah Perez7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesStephanie Haber vs Samantha Schuster3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Wood / Janice Malos vs Tanya Hale / Angela Stevens2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSharon Tong vs Kelly Kedge7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAmber Candelaria / Vanessa Nicole Rowe vs Lisa Cook / Nancy Holland4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-05-22Lost 05
L#1 DoublesAllison Ibarguen / Carolyn Wood vs Jamie Feller / Andi Berger3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCindy Nguyen vs Valerie Witherspoon4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaurie Lenhart / Vanessa Nicole Rowe vs Donna Lefever / Karen Wooldridge3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAmber Candelaria vs Yarisbel Schieck2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRachael Boyle / Janice Malos vs Melissa Ruediger / Anna Clark3-6, 3-6
2025-05-10vs TPCLost 04
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Wood / Liyan Liu vs Sunny Glendon / EMELIA ALLEN1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCindy Nguyen vs Rowena Messner5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeralyn Marchesi / Janice Malos vs Shaun Bruce / Mandy Hansen2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAmber Candelaria vs Amanda Gumberg1-6, 0-6
2025-05-03vs DTC #3Won 41
W#1 DoublesRachael Boyle / Janice Malos vs Mari Valvo / Fiona Yeh2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMonica Baldwin vs Catherine Sullivan5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChandra VanPaepeghem / Allison Ibarguen vs Shellene Goudge / Kathryn Garlan6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesVanessa Nicole Rowe vs Karen Hom6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJeralyn Marchesi / Laurie Lenhart vs Erin Jolly / Nicole Medas3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-04-26vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2Won 32
W#1 DoublesLiyan Liu / Chandra VanPaepeghem vs Jennifer Petrie / Holly Dexter4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCindy Nguyen vs Emily Courville4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVanessa Nicole Rowe / Jeralyn Marchesi vs Sally Zimmerman / PJ Shouldis6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMonica Baldwin vs Rose Gerrard6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAllison Ibarguen / Carolyn Wood vs Jan Willis / Jane Doe6-4, 6-4
2025-04-12vs DTC #3Won 32
L#1 DoublesAllison Ibarguen / Vanessa Nicole Rowe vs Megan Bell / Nicole Reyes1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAmber Candelaria vs Catherine Sullivan3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLiyan Liu / Chandra VanPaepeghem vs Gillean Baluyut / Kathryn Garlan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMonica Baldwin vs Melania Butko6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRachael Boyle / Janice Malos vs Karen Hom / Mari Valvo6-1, 6-3
2025-04-05Won 32
W#1 DoublesVanessa Nicole Rowe / Allison Ibarguen vs Melissa Ruediger / Andi Berger2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmber Candelaria vs Valerie Witherspoon4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Wood / Liyan Liu vs Melissa Hicks / Kelly Nguyen6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesStephanie Haber vs Anna Clark3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJeralyn Marchesi / Chandra VanPaepeghem vs Karen Wooldridge / Lisa Schnitz6-3, 6-3
2025-03-29vs TPCLost 13
L#1 DoublesVanessa Nicole Rowe / Laurie Lenhart vs Shaun Bruce / Mandy Hansen1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCindy Nguyen vs Rowena Messner4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRachael Boyle / Janice Malos vs Sunny Glendon / EMELIA ALLEN4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLiyan Liu / Sharon Tong vs Susan Grady / Stephanie McGregor6-3, 6-2
2025-03-22vs SUMMERLIN ARBORSWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaurie Lenhart / Robi Hinton vs Lisa Cook / Nancy Holland1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesVanessa Nicole Rowe vs Melissa Rojas6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSharon Tong vs Ramona Acosta6-3, 6-0
2025-03-15vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2Lost 04
L#1 DoublesMonica Baldwin / Allison Ibarguen vs Tracey Cutler / Cheri Prescott4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSharon Tong vs Elena Rooney0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRachael Boyle / Janice Malos vs Jennifer Petrie / Cathy Vanderford3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCindy Nguyen vs Emily Courville1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN- 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Chandra VanPaepeghem
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Allison Ibarguen
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.33
Vanessa Nicole Rowe
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Monica Baldwin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Carolyn Wood
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.01
Jeralyn Marchesi
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #2 Singles 18% · published 3
2.93
Robi Hinton
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published 3
Amber Candelaria
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
Janice Malos
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.74
Laurie Lenhart
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
2.74
Cindy Nguyen
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
Liyan Liu
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Rachael Boyle
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Sharon Tong
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Stephanie Haber
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Ibarguen + Vanessa Nicole Rowe14755% games+5.7% vs expected
Janice Malos + Rachael Boyle3843% games+1.5% vs expected
Allison Ibarguen + Jeralyn Marchesi1542% games+0.8% vs expected
Rachael Boyle + Vanessa Nicole Rowe2445% games−0.6% vs expected
Laurie Lenhart + Robi Hinton2444% games−1.5% vs expected
Janice Malos + Carolyn Wood3438% games−1.8% vs expected
Vanessa Nicole Rowe + Amber Candelaria1544% games−3.8% vs expected
Allison Ibarguen + Amber Candelaria6746% games−4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chandra VanPaepeghem
85W–48L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Allison Ibarguen
64W–68L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
Vanessa Nicole Rowe
101W–67L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Monica Baldwin
97W–88L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Carolyn Wood
93W–92L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Jeralyn Marchesi
216W–189L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Robi Hinton
129W–93L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Amber Candelaria
60W–93L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Janice Malos
29W–58L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Lenhart
41W–87L career · 9 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Cindy Nguyen
33W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Liyan Liu
11W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachael Boyle
59W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Tong
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Haber
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.