CPV RED
2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER
15 players · average NTRP 3.95 / COLORADO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule7 played
i
Flight standings52 teams · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1CM ORANGE | 7 | 0 | 14 | 221 |
| 2SKY YELLOW | 7 | 0 | 19 | 241 |
| 3LTFC ORANGE | 6 | 1 | 27 | 284 |
| 4CVTA GREEN | 6 | 1 | 29 | 268 |
| 5DTP NAVY | 6 | 1 | 33 | 291 |
| 6SS-D TEAL | 5 | 1 | 26 | 255 |
| 7GR NAVY | 5 | 2 | 30 | 259 |
| 8ATC GREEN | 5 | 2 | 31 | 300 |
| 9KC-RH PINK | 5 | 2 | 32 | 291 |
| 10SS-D RED | 5 | 2 | 33 | 279 |
| 11DTP PINK | 5 | 2 | 34 | 287 |
| 12PCC SILVER | 5 | 2 | 35 | 295 |
| 13LEBTC PINK | 5 | 2 | 36 | 295 |
| 14BCC GOLD | 5 | 2 | 37 | 317 |
| 15BRMST YELLOW | 4 | 2 | 30 | 222 |
| 16SS-H GREY | 4 | 2 | 33 | 264 |
| 17BM BLUE | 4 | 3 | 31 | 261 |
| 18HV SILVER | 4 | 3 | 34 | 300 |
| 19SS-D BLUE | 4 | 3 | 36 | 307 |
| 20SS-LT GOLD | 4 | 3 | 42 | 300 |
| 21EM YELLOW | 4 | 3 | 42 | 329 |
| 22GR SILVER | 4 | 3 | 44 | 310 |
| 23LPTC PURPLE | 3 | 3 | 40 | 289 |
| 24CPV RED | 3 | 4 | 39 | 290 |
| 25PRKR RED | 3 | 4 | 40 | 318 |
| 26PRKR NAVY | 3 | 4 | 42 | 325 |
| 27VC YELLOW | 3 | 4 | 43 | 327 |
| 28GAC PURPLE | 3 | 4 | 44 | 354 |
| 29SKY GREY | 3 | 4 | 45 | 326 |
| 30CHCC GOLD | 3 | 4 | 49 | 361 |
| 31KNO RED | 2 | 4 | 31 | 281 |
| 32KC-RH YELLOW | 2 | 4 | 36 | 289 |
| 33MVCC PURPLE | 2 | 4 | 36 | 276 |
| 34CACM BLUE | 2 | 5 | 39 | 302 |
| 35DCHS YELLOW | 2 | 5 | 42 | 328 |
| 36SH GOLD | 2 | 5 | 45 | 317 |
| 37WP-L PINK | 2 | 5 | 45 | 327 |
| 38KC-CC ORANGE | 2 | 5 | 46 | 345 |
| 39PCC GOLD | 2 | 5 | 47 | 343 |
| 40CVTA BLACK | 2 | 5 | 49 | 341 |
| 41RMTC BLACK | 2 | 5 | 50 | 351 |
| 42GPTC RED | 1 | 5 | 45 | 316 |
| 43CVTA NAVY | 1 | 5 | 45 | 320 |
| 44LTC-M ORANGE | 1 | 5 | 53 | 346 |
| 45SS-H BLUE | 1 | 6 | 46 | 333 |
| 46KC-RH GREEN | 1 | 6 | 51 | 358 |
| 47TTA PINK | 1 | 6 | 52 | 351 |
| 48SS-LT TEAL | 1 | 6 | 52 | 379 |
| 49CM TEAL | 1 | 6 | 53 | 354 |
| 50HW TEAL | 1 | 6 | 57 | 390 |
| 51SS-D GREEN | 0 | 7 | 60 | 395 |
| 52SS-LT RED | 0 | 7 | 63 | 403 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Mark Voss + Lance Bourque | 4–3 | 48% games | +5.3% vs expected |
| Jonathan Landis + Azim Khan | 3–2 | 53% games | +0.5% vs expected |
| Mark Voss + Gregory Moseley | 0–5 | 36% games | −5.1% vs expected |
| Jonathan Landis + Alex Mercer | 5–8 | 46% games | −7.1% vs expected |
| Lance Bourque + Gregory Moseley | 4–3 | 50% games | −7.5% vs expected |
| Mark Voss + Eamon Twomey | 2–3 | 44% games | not enough data |
| Lance Bourque + Azim Khan | 1–4 | 48% games | not enough data |
| Jonathan Landis + Lance Bourque | 1–3 | 4 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.