Teams

SH BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs RRTC NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoshua Yeddis / Ryan Moriarty vs Sean Hudelson / Quinn Hudelson6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Gerhards / Tim Carnegie vs Frank Coria / Adam Woodworth4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJim Vernon / John Baker vs Todd Chancey / Trevor Chancey6-4, 6-3
2024-05-22vs HRCA-S GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrian Bigelow / Stuva Maniatis vs Brandon Neff / Alex Treichel5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJim Vernon / Nick Hinton vs Marshall Nichols / Scott Hunt4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJoshua Yeddis / Tim Carnegie vs Frank Koppala / Heyden Pue2-6, 2-6
2024-05-15vs DCHS GOLDLost 03
L#1 DoublesRyan Moriarty / Joshua Yeddis vs Kevin Hodnett / G F Tanham4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Bigelow / Tim Carnegie vs Chris Horger / Steve Witter3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJim Vernon / Stuva Maniatis vs Mark Kostecki / Mark Smith3-6, 3-6
2024-05-08vs PRC REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesNick Hinton / Terry Wong vs Chris Young / Mike Wilson3-3
W#1 SinglesBrian Bigelow vs Martin Powers6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRyan Moriarty / Stuva Maniatis vs Chad Smith / Paul Hemann7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKeith Gerhards vs Ian Dyer4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJim Vernon / John Baker vs Steve Caffrey / Jeremy Mayoss5-7, 4-6
2024-05-08vs CPV REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRyan Moriarty / Joshua Yeddis vs Matthew Anderson / Ryan Shirley6-1, 1-5
L#1 SinglesKeith Gerhards vs Nathan Herr4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesNick Hinton / Stuva Maniatis vs Lance Bourque / Azim Khan7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTim Carnegie / Jim Vernon vs Mark Voss / Michael Gersack2-6, 0-6
2024-04-24vs SS-LT BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesTerry Wong / Stuva Maniatis vs Thomas Samuelson / Julio Casillas1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Gerhards / Joshua Yeddis vs Robert Alexander / Andy Rinehart3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Baker / Nick Hinton vs Jeff Johnson / William Hummer6-3, 6-3
2024-04-17vs PRKR REDLost 05
L#1 DoublesBrian Bigelow / Stuva Maniatis vs Hoang Nguyen / Jon Szumny4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKeith Gerhards vs Daniel Read4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJim Vernon / John Baker vs Aaron Burns / Mitchell Harper1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJoshua Yeddis vs Michael Merfeld5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTim Carnegie / Terry Wong vs Todd Campbell / Dean Schafer4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings19 teams · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MEA ORANGE7027818221
2HRCA-S GREEN7028720268
3BTA-IBM RED6025514183
4WP ORANGE6130515267
5CACM GREY6126924253
6LTC-M NAVY61241128314
7BM ORANGE61241129275
8APR-MW BLUE61211434304
9LTC-M RED61201541341
10MC BRONZE52231229267
11HRCA-N ORANGE43181740320
12HFII GREEN33131736258
13ATC RED34171845339
14SKY SILVER25152047355
15LTA-Q YELLOW25152049353
16KC-RH BRONZE16132248339
17KC-RH SILVER16122349348
18DTC NAVY16112451372
19SH BLUE1682757388

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Bigelow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.62
Nick Hinton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.55
Joshua Yeddis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.46
Jim Vernon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Terry Wong
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Keith Gerhards
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Stuva Maniatis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tim Carnegie
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Carnegie + Nick Hinton3647% games−1.3% vs expected
Joshua Yeddis + Tim Carnegie1632% games−14.2% vs expected
Terry Wong + Keith Gerhards314 matchesnot enough data
Joshua Yeddis + Jim Vernon134 matchesnot enough data
Jim Vernon + Nick Hinton044 matchesnot enough data
Brian Bigelow + Stuva Maniatis224 matchesnot enough data
Terry Wong + Joshua Yeddis123 matchesnot enough data
Terry Wong + Jim Vernon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Bigelow
21W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nick Hinton
32W–38L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Joshua Yeddis
20W–52L career · 6 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Jim Vernon
30W–66L career · 6 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
Terry Wong
71W–60L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Keith Gerhards
12W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stuva Maniatis
3W–8L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Carnegie
14W–43L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.