Teams

PRC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs PRKR REDLost 12
L#2 DoublesIan Dyer / Paul Hemann vs Todd Campbell / Hoang Nguyen3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesGriffin Mayoss vs Daniel Read7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSteve Caffrey / Scott Mannix vs Aaron Burns / Mitchell Harper6-3, 7-6
2024-05-22vs RRTC NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteve Caffrey / Jeremy Mayoss vs Alan Gillespie / Rick Madison3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesChris Young / Rick Wolfgang vs Todd Chancey / Sean Hudelson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesScott Mannix vs Quinn Hudelson4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-05-15vs HRCA-S GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNabeel Meghji / Mike Wilson vs Brandon Neff / Jeff Aberle2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGriffin Mayoss vs Marshall Nichols1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChris Young / Mark Hollenbeck vs Scott Hunt / Ryan Griffin6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesIan Dyer / Jeremy Mayoss vs Brian Smith / Frank Koppala7-5, 6-4
2024-05-08vs SH BLUESplit 22
L#1 SinglesMartin Powers vs Brian Bigelow4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChad Smith / Paul Hemann vs Ryan Moriarty / Stuva Maniatis7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesIan Dyer vs Keith Gerhards6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSteve Caffrey / Jeremy Mayoss vs Jim Vernon / John Baker7-5, 6-4
2024-05-08vs DCHS GOLDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNabeel Meghji / Mike Wilson vs G F Tanham / Kevin Hodnett6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGriffin Mayoss vs Vishal Rawal1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Caffrey / Jeremy Mayoss vs Nicholas Moore / Mark Smith1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPaul Hemann / Ian Dyer vs Brian Varner / Chris Horger6-3, 7-6
2024-04-24vs CPV REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesMark Hollenbeck / Chris Young vs Matthew Anderson / Ryan Shirley6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGriffin Mayoss vs Nicholas Claassen6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesScott Mannix / Martin Powers vs Mark Voss / Michael Gersack6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesNabeel Meghji vs Brandt Payne6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSteve Caffrey / Jeremy Mayoss vs George Schneider / Lance Bourque7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-17vs SS-LT BLUELost 14
L#1 DoublesNabeel Meghji / Chris Young vs Thomas Samuelson / Sunghoon Kim4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMartin Powers vs Ryan Burbary0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesIan Dyer / Mike Wilson vs Brad Shores / Matt Collins4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesGriffin Mayoss vs Julio Casillas6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChad Smith / Scott Mannix vs Stephen Houy / Brad Hatfield6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Nabeel Meghji
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.83
Mark Hollenbeck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Ian Dyer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.78
Rick Wolfgang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Griffin Mayoss
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.67
Scott Mannix
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.59
Paul Hemann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Jeremy Mayoss
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.41
Steve Caffrey
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Martin Powers
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Hemann + Ian Dyer6359% games+13.7% vs expected
Scott Mannix + Martin Powers10256% games+7.6% vs expected
Scott Mannix + Steve Caffrey4253% games+5.2% vs expected
Steve Caffrey + Ian Dyer7260% games+5.0% vs expected
Jeremy Mayoss + Rick Wolfgang3256% games+1.7% vs expected
Steve Caffrey + Mark Hollenbeck6353% games−0.4% vs expected
Steve Caffrey + Nabeel Meghji6254% games−3.8% vs expected
Steve Caffrey + Jeremy Mayoss1444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nabeel Meghji
86W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.84
Mark Hollenbeck
31W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Ian Dyer
65W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
Rick Wolfgang
22W–31L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Griffin Mayoss
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Mannix
22W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Paul Hemann
46W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.59
Jeremy Mayoss
37W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Steve Caffrey
42W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
3.41
Martin Powers
17W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.