Teams

Case

2024 55&Over Women · 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.86 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-26vs GoffinWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeverly Swimm / Jennifer Evans vs Donna Arnold / Theresa Cary6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngela Case / Cyndy Preiser vs Regina Lindsay / Shannon Gillson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-12vs Northern: It Takes 2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNora Breen / Jacqueline Falvey vs Arilee Bagley / Karen Quinn2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCyndy Preiser / Angela Case vs Angela Miczek / Marie Collazo3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeverly Swimm / Jennifer Evans vs Linda Breen / Sandra Nolte1-6, 6-7
2024-08-05vs GoffinWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngela Case / Victoria Madonna vs Michelle Schrader / Deborah Davis1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Evans / Beverly Swimm vs Pam Zentko / Wendy Goffin6-0, 6-2
2024-07-22vs Northern: It Takes 2Split 11
L#1 DoublesAngela Case / Cyndy Preiser vs Angela Miczek / Marie Collazo5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBeverly Swimm / Jennifer Evans vs Denise Potenza / Elizabeth Ballantine6-4, 6-3
2024-07-15vs GoffinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAngela Case / Cyndy Preiser vs Theresa Cary / Dawn Keenan6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSuzannah Dormond / Beverly Swimm vs Donna Arnold / Michelle Schrader2-6, 2-6
2024-07-01vs Northern: It Takes 2Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAngela Case / Cyndy Preiser vs Arilee Bagley / Debra Ahola6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKate Owens / Jennifer Evans vs Denise Potenza / Elizabeth Ballantine2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDee Fallati / Suzannah Dormond vs Jeannine McGhie / Susan Nye2-6, 1-6
2024-06-10vs Northern: It Takes 2Won 21
L#1 DoublesAngela Case / Dee Fallati vs Denise Potenza / Marie Collazo4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVictoria Madonna / Roge Nesbitt vs Debra Ahola / Sandra Nolte6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBeverly Swimm / Jennifer Evans vs Janet George / Joyce Eggleston6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Northern: It Takes 27117716159
2Case34101125197
3Goffin1651633212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Beverly Swimm
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Roge Nesbitt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Victoria Madonna
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Cyndy Preiser
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.46
Angela Case
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.29
Suzannah Dormond
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Dee Fallati
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jacqueline Falvey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Evans
published
Kate Owens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Roccario
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lori McCaffrey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Martha Fashouer
published
Mary Bunch
published
Nora Breen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Falvey + Lori McCaffrey18367% games+11.8% vs expected
Beverly Swimm + Lori McCaffrey13169% games+7.1% vs expected
Cyndy Preiser + Angela Case111049% games+1.5% vs expected
Roge Nesbitt + Victoria Madonna1158752% games−0.5% vs expected
Beverly Swimm + Suzannah Dormond6449% games−12.5% vs expected
Leslie Roccario + Jacqueline Falvey6357% gamesnot enough data
Beverly Swimm + Nora Breen6262% gamesnot enough data
Jacqueline Falvey + Suzannah Dormond314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beverly Swimm
121W–98L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Roge Nesbitt
218W–147L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.85
4
Victoria Madonna
223W–148L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Cyndy Preiser
46W–65L career · 5 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Angela Case
144W–106L career · 9 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Suzannah Dormond
143W–142L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Dee Fallati
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jacqueline Falvey
63W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Evans
56W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kate Owens
7W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Leslie Roccario
20W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori McCaffrey
115W–48L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Martha Fashouer
26W–43L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Bunch
32W–51L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nora Breen
34W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.