Teams

LA - Downtown Aces

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over – LA · LA - Women 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.77 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Diana Rochford
published 4
3.74
Christina Islas
published 4
3.73
Liesel Reinisch
published 4
3.68
Theona Zhordania
published 4
3.64
Aubrey Karr
published 4
3.62
Dana Reinisch
published 4
3.60
Emma Gardner
published
3.60
Nicole Winslow
published 4
3.57
Sandra Manion
published
3.44
Aram Hamidi
published 4
3.43
Marion Bright
published
3.39
Maria Sviridova
published 3.5
3.23
Diane Quan
published 3.5
3.16
Yoko Kanayama
published
3.13
Claire Gibbs
published 3.5
2.95
Maryann Brandon
published 3.5
2.88
Fariba Navid
published
2.44
Andrea Crum
published 3
Julia Sargsyan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Reinisch + Liesel Reinisch6653% games+3.7% vs expected
Fariba Navid + Yoko Kanayama1436% games−3.1% vs expected
Nicole Winslow + Liesel Reinisch2449% gamesnot enough data
Nicole Winslow + Theona Zhordania033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Rochford
22W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Christina Islas
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Liesel Reinisch
31W–46L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Theona Zhordania
117W–121L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Aubrey Karr
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Dana Reinisch
103W–77L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.62
Emma Gardner
23W–26L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Nicole Winslow
44W–62L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Sandra Manion
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Aram Hamidi
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.44
Marion Bright
32W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Maria Sviridova
63W–48L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
3.39
3.5
Diane Quan
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Yoko Kanayama
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Claire Gibbs
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Maryann Brandon
94W–139L career · type A · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95
Fariba Navid
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.88
3
Andrea Crum
1W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.44
Julia Sargsyan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.