Teams

Chata/Pat Majestic

2026 CHATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '25 · Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-25vs Chata/Susan RollingsWon 30
W#1 DoublesPat Majestic / Jeanne Jones vs Leslie Battle / Elizabeth Willimon7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Smith / Lauren Rodriguez vs Kim Myers / Debbie Cochran2-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Morman / Donna Jarzen vs Elizabeth Barber / Jessica Livingston6-4, 6-2
2025-10-19vs Chata/Susan RollingsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPaige Winters / Donna Jarzen vs Susan Rollings / Ashley Kersey2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKate Updegrove / Erin Meeks vs Cathy Arrington / Elizabeth Barber6-4, 6-4
2025-10-14vs Chata/Susan RollingsWon 30
W#1 DoublesKate Updegrove / Jeanne Jones vs Kami Adams / Kim Myers6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Rodriguez / Pat Majestic vs Jennifer Knox / Leslie Battle6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKaren Bryant / Angela McSpadden vs Elizabeth Willimon / Elizabeth Barber4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-12vs Chata/Susan RollingsWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Morman / Julie Smith vs Cathy Arrington / Ashley Kersey6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLauren Rodriguez / Kate Updegrove vs Elizabeth Barber / Elizabeth Willimon6-0, 6-3
2025-10-01vs Chata/Susan RollingsWon 21
L#1 DoublesPat Majestic / Lisa Morman vs Cathy Arrington / Elizabeth Barber6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKate Updegrove / Erin Meeks vs Leslie Battle / Jennifer Knox6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Rodriguez / Angela McSpadden vs Jessica Livingston / Debbie Cochran6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-28vs Chata/Susan RollingsWon 21
W#1 DoublesPat Majestic / Jeanne Jones vs Kami Adams / Amanda Nolen6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Morman / Karen Bryant vs Heather Graham / Ashley Kersey6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Rodriguez / Kate Updegrove vs Susan Rollings / Kim Myers6-4, 6-2
2025-09-27vs Chata/Susan RollingsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Smith / Lisa Morman vs Ashley Kersey / Leslie Battle4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesErin Meeks / Donna Jarzen vs Susan Rollings / Kami Adams0-6, 4-6
2025-09-16vs Chata/Susan RollingsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeanne Jones / Angela McSpadden vs Kim Myers / Cathy Arrington1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPat Majestic / Lauren Rodriguez vs Jessica Livingston / Kami Adams5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesErin Meeks / Kate Updegrove vs Ashley Kersey / Heather Graham6-7, 5-7
2025-09-09vs Chata/Susan RollingsWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Morman / Karen Bryant vs Jessica Livingston / Kami Adams3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPat Majestic / Jeanne Jones vs Leslie Battle / Jennifer Knox6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Rodriguez / Erin Meeks vs Amanda Nolen / Debbie Cochran6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Lauren Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.24
Lisa Morman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.23
Paige Winters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Kate Updegrove
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Jeanne Jones
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.98
Pat Majestic
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Angela McSpadden
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.76
Erin Meeks
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.64
Donna Jarzen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jamie Livingston
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Jarzen + Lauren Rodriguez314 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Morman + Pat Majestic044 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Rodriguez + Erin Meeks314 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Rodriguez + Kate Updegrove404 matchesnot enough data
Erin Meeks + Kate Updegrove213 matchesnot enough data
Pat Majestic + Jeanne Jones213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Rodriguez
34W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Lisa Morman
11W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
Paige Winters
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Kate Updegrove
19W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jeanne Jones
9W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.06
Pat Majestic
17W–41L career · 6 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Angela McSpadden
17W–9L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Erin Meeks
22W–29L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Donna Jarzen
15W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.64
Jamie Livingston
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.