Teams

8.0 PTC Lapane M65S

2022 SPRING Adult 65 & Over - CAZ · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-01vs PHX/CoxTanham/65Over/8.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesP Anderson / Leo Lapane vs Chuck Raplinger / G F Tanham6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTim Moman / Craig Twitchell vs George Orchard / Timothy Shum6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJohn Daniel Hopkins / Mickey Burke vs Chris Cox / Gregory Russell5-7, 5-7
2022-04-01vs PHX/CoxTanham/65Over/8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Lampman / Jeffrey Marshall vs Chris Cox / G F Tanham2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Elmore / Michael Kroelinger vs Chuck Raplinger / Gregory Russell1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Daniel Hopkins / James Munsil vs George Orchard / Timothy Shum1-6, 3-6
2022-03-18vs PHX/CoxTanham/65Over/8.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Lampman / Marlin Godown vs Randolph Beerman / Timothy Shum2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Daniel Hopkins / James Munsil vs Chris Shol / Craig Zirbel2-6, 1-6
2022-03-18vs PHX/CoxTanham/65Over/8.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Daniel Hopkins / Robert Lampman vs Chris Shol / Timothy Shum6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMickey Burke / Craig Twitchell vs Randolph Beerman / George Orchard5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesP Anderson / Marlin Godown vs Chuck Raplinger / Craig Zirbel2-6, 4-6
2022-03-11vs PHX/CoxTanham/65Over/8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Daniel Hopkins / Robert Lampman vs George Orchard / Chuck Raplinger4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Elmore / Bennet Serkin vs Chris Cox / G F Tanham3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Marshall / James Munsil vs Chris Shol / Craig Zirbel2-6, 2-6
2022-03-11vs PHX/CoxTanham/65Over/8.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesTim Moman / Craig Twitchell vs Mario Dominguez / Chris Shol7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesP Anderson / Marlin Godown vs Chuck Raplinger / George Orchard3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Daniel Hopkins / Leo Lapane vs Chris Cox / G F Tanham5-7, 0-6
2022-03-04vs PHX/CoxTanham/65Over/8.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesP Anderson / Mickey Burke vs Chris Cox / G F Tanham6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTim Moman / Craig Twitchell vs Chuck Raplinger / Timothy Shum7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesFrank Figueroa / Bennet Serkin vs Chris Shol / Craig Zirbel3-6, 6-7
2022-03-04vs PHX/CoxTanham/65Over/8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesP Anderson / Tim Moman vs Chuck Raplinger / Timothy Shum2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMickey Burke / Craig Twitchell vs Chris Shol / Mario Dominguez2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesFrank Figueroa / Michael Kroelinger vs Chris Cox / G F Tanham3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PHX/CoxTanham/65Over/8.0M7119512161
28.0 PTC Lapane M65S1751939266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Craig Twitchell
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
James Munsil
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Frank Figueroa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
David Elmore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jeffrey Marshall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Leo Lapane
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Marlin Godown
published
Michael Kroelinger
published
Mickey Burke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
P Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Robert Lampman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Moman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Moman + Craig Twitchell7060% gamesnot enough data
Craig Twitchell + Frank Figueroa303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Craig Twitchell
25W–8L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
James Munsil
2W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Frank Figueroa
3W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
David Elmore
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeffrey Marshall
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Leo Lapane
5W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marlin Godown
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Kroelinger
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mickey Burke
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
P Anderson
1W–6L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Lampman
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tim Moman
7W–3L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.