Teams

DShuman

2022 Cap Spring USTA 55 & over · 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-10vs RRubin/LeeLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Cole / Joseph Roney vs Julian Barnes / Roger Hatlen5-7, 1-6
2022-05-03vs JCockerhamLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Strande / Stephen Cole vs Philip Robertson / Ken Haney6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-28vs PWilliams NHC55Won 10
W#1 DoublesStephen Cole / Scott Hammond vs Dane Huffman / Robert O'Han6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-19vs IMKocurekLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Cole / Thomas Strande vs Todd Blevins / Bill Green2-6, 0-6
2022-04-12vs MBeneckyWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephen Cole / John Hulicki vs Michael Benecky / Reymond Lozares6-4, 6-2
2022-04-08vs DSwannWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Hammond / John Hulicki vs James Worley / David Swann6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-03-29vs MGentry 55+ 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Hulicki / Thomas Milici vs Scott Baltz / Mark Gentry6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-03-22vs WTurner/Evans 55Won 10
W#1 DoublesScott Hammond / John Hulicki vs Steve Schinkel / Mitch Strobin2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-03-15vs JParhamLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Hulicki / Scott Hammond vs Rhett Hartley / Ronnie Duncan5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
John Hulicki
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Stephen Cole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Scott Hammond
published
3.12
Eric Rubin
published 3.5
2.93
Jeffrey Miller
published
2.83
Joseph Roney
published
2.74
Thomas Milici
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Miller + John Hulicki134 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Cole + John Hulicki314 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Cole + Scott Hammond303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
John Hulicki
162W–115L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Stephen Cole
68W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Scott Hammond
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Eric Rubin
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Jeffrey Miller
18W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.93
Joseph Roney
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Thomas Milici
26W–28L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.