Teams

CP:Point Players:Clarke/Garcia

2021 SCT Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 3

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-25vs CP:UnMatchables:ZaeskeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTracey Langlois / Dan Langlois vs Diane Falconer / Scott Falconer6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCindy Lannon / Joseph Bonitatebus vs Susan Carroll / Kelsey Nix2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-06-18vs SOL:Chip 'N Charge:Corrado/SimmonsLost 12
W#1 DoublesTracey Langlois / Dan Langlois vs Chris Corrado / Marlena Simmons6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJoseph Garcia / Denise Thomas vs Russvelt Vyas / Emily Catto3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Bonitatebus / Cindy Lannon vs Jorge Linero / Paula Park5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2021-06-04vs CP:UnMatchables:ZaeskeLost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Thomas / Eric Bass vs DANA CRANE / Unni Nair4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoseph Bonitatebus / Sandra Gladstone vs Tatiane Canady / Mark Zaeske3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTeresa Haughey / John Breunig vs Susan Carroll / Kelsey Nix3-2
2021-05-16vs SOL:Chip 'N Charge:Corrado/SimmonsLost 02
L#1 DoublesDan Langlois / Cindy Lannon vs Adam Strom / Judy Bloom3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Breunig / Ellen Clarke vs Chris Corrado / Nancy Ossenfort1-6, 0-6
2021-05-08vs SOL:Chip 'N Charge:Corrado/SimmonsLost 12
W#1 DoublesTracey Langlois / Dan Langlois vs Emily Catto / Yoonho Park7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCindy Lannon / Joseph Bonitatebus vs Brian Hogan / Nancy Ossenfort3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Garcia / Ellen Clarke vs Jorge Linero / Marlena Simmons3-6, 1-6
2021-05-02vs CP:UnMatchables:ZaeskeLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Lannon / Dan Langlois vs Dawn Israel / Unni Nair3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTeresa Haughey / Joseph Bonitatebus vs DANA CRANE / J Mehl2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShirley Liu / John Breunig vs Tatiane Canady / Mark Zaeske1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 7.0 Mixed 3
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CP:Unstrung Heroes:das Neves/Torres061448118
2MRC:All Mixed Up:Islam0613512143
3KH:Love Hurts:Welch0613512129
4CP:UnMatchables:Zaeske0612615137
5MRC:Match Makers:Capanna/Kinoshita0611718143
6SOL:Chip 'N Charge:Corrado/Simmons0610819159
7CP:Chelsea Tsunami:Raman0661225182
8CP:Point Players:Clarke/Garcia0651326169
9TRC:Fields of Dreams:Fields0631530191
104S:2021 40+ Mixed Reactions:Gregor/Haskins0631531202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dan Langlois
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Eric Bass
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.79
Ellen Clarke
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.69
Shirley Liu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Cindy Lannon
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Denise Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
John Breunig
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Joseph Bonitatebus
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Joseph Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Sandra Gladstone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Teresa Haughey
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Tracey Langlois
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Lannon + Joseph Bonitatebus2842% games+4.9% vs expected
Tracey Langlois + Dan Langlois131252% games+2.8% vs expected
Teresa Haughey + John Breunig2631% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Clarke + Joseph Garcia0721% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Haughey + Joseph Bonitatebus044 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Clarke + Joseph Bonitatebus033 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Lannon + Dan Langlois123 matchesnot enough data
John Breunig + Shirley Liu033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dan Langlois
33W–24L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Eric Bass
13W–23L career · type S · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Ellen Clarke
56W–146L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
94%6%<1%
2.79
Shirley Liu
74W–120L career · 1 line in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Cindy Lannon
52W–119L career · 5 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
2.66
Denise Thomas
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
John Breunig
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Joseph Bonitatebus
14W–47L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Joseph Garcia
18W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandra Gladstone
47W–45L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Teresa Haughey
39W–60L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tracey Langlois
107W–74L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.