Teams

CP:UnMatchables:Zaeske

2021 SCT Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 3

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-25vs CP:Point Players:Clarke/GarciaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiane Falconer / Scott Falconer vs Tracey Langlois / Dan Langlois2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Carroll / Kelsey Nix vs Cindy Lannon / Joseph Bonitatebus2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesErin Harris / Unni Nair vs Cinthia Griot / Axel Martens6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDiane Falconer / Scott Falconer vs Mary Lynn Strom / Yoonho Park3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDawn Israel / Evan Rosenberg vs Paula Park / Chris Corrado6-2, 6-4
2021-06-11vs SOL:Chip 'N Charge:Corrado/SimmonsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesErin Harris / Kunal Maini vs Judy Bloom / David Lee6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmanda Ansell / Scott Falconer vs Cinthia Griot / Axel Martens7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2021-06-04vs CP:Point Players:Clarke/GarciaWon 21
W#1 DoublesDANA CRANE / Unni Nair vs Denise Thomas / Eric Bass6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTatiane Canady / Mark Zaeske vs Joseph Bonitatebus / Sandra Gladstone6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSusan Carroll / Kelsey Nix vs Teresa Haughey / John Breunig2-3
W#1 DoublesJ Mehl / Erin Harris vs David Lee / Judy Bloom6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesUnni Nair / Dawn Israel vs Adam Strom / Nancy Ossenfort6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKunal Maini / DANA CRANE vs Chris Corrado / Maria-Elena Fernandez-Beros3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-02vs CP:Point Players:Clarke/GarciaWon 30
W#1 DoublesDawn Israel / Unni Nair vs Cindy Lannon / Dan Langlois6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDANA CRANE / J Mehl vs Teresa Haughey / Joseph Bonitatebus6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTatiane Canady / Mark Zaeske vs Shirley Liu / John Breunig6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 7.0 Mixed 3
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CP:Unstrung Heroes:das Neves/Torres061448118
2MRC:All Mixed Up:Islam0613512143
3KH:Love Hurts:Welch0613512129
4CP:UnMatchables:Zaeske0612615137
5MRC:Match Makers:Capanna/Kinoshita0611718143
6SOL:Chip 'N Charge:Corrado/Simmons0610819159
7CP:Chelsea Tsunami:Raman0661225182
8CP:Point Players:Clarke/Garcia0651326169
9TRC:Fields of Dreams:Fields0631530191
104S:2021 40+ Mixed Reactions:Gregor/Haskins0631531202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Erin Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Tatiane Canady
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
J Mehl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Unni Nair
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Susan Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Kunal Maini
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Adina Zaeske
published 3.5
DANA CRANE
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Scott Falconer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Dawn Israel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Diane Falconer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Amanda Ansell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Kelsey Nix
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Evan Rosenberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Zaeske
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kunal Maini + Erin Harris11258% games+12.8% vs expected
Dawn Israel + Unni Nair11458% games+11.7% vs expected
Evan Rosenberg + DANA CRANE5348% games−1.1% vs expected
Susan Carroll + Kelsey Nix2536% games−9.8% vs expected
Diane Falconer + Scott Falconer91743% games−16.4% vs expected
Mark Zaeske + Tatiane Canady4157% gamesnot enough data
Evan Rosenberg + Susan Carroll134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Carroll + Kunal Maini134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erin Harris
222W–83L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.88
Tatiane Canady
54W–23L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
J Mehl
32W–8L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Unni Nair
169W–68L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
3.53
Susan Carroll
78W–56L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Kunal Maini
178W–70L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Adina Zaeske
21W–37L career · type A · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
DANA CRANE
87W–72L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Scott Falconer
46W–43L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Dawn Israel
142W–110L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Diane Falconer
155W–134L career · 2 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Amanda Ansell
67W–90L career · 1 line in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.01
Kelsey Nix
26W–34L career · 2 lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
2.98
Evan Rosenberg
31W–35L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Mark Zaeske
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.