Teams

MRC:All Mixed Up:Islam

2021 SCT Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 3

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-27vs TRC:Fields of Dreams:FieldsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMina Kim / Bruce Ratcliffe vs Lorraine Oldale / Steven Weiner6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Hanley / Karen Hanley vs Scott Gentry / Mary Zubrinsky3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesNancy Hawley / Matthew Berger vs Diane Sullivan / Kenneth Grice6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Bandak / Anthony Kim vs Quinn Fusco / David Miles7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJulie Mooney / James Smith vs Janine Capanna / Steven Sax0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-06-06vs TRC:Fields of Dreams:FieldsWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Daly / Nick Genovese vs Elizabeth Jaykus / Paul Wizda2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Mooney / James Smith vs Dara Lieberson / JUAN OVIEDO7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSusan Ratcliffe / Bruce Ratcliffe vs Nicole Rivera / Jeff Pressman6-3, 6-3
2021-06-04vs MRC:Match Makers:Capanna/KinoshitaLost 12
L#1 DoublesSohel Islam / Mina Kim vs Janine Capanna / Steven Sax4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Berger / Nancy Hawley vs David Miles / Jacqueline Cassidy7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKaren Hanley / Jeffrey Hanley vs Quinn Fusco / Michael Piera1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesSilvia Islam / Sohel Islam vs Jacqueline Cassidy / Glenn Lungarini6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJames Smith / Julie Mooney vs Brian McCauley / Diane Sullivan4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Ratcliffe / Bruce Ratcliffe vs Miyako Kinoshita / Steve Rosa6-2, 6-2
2021-05-08vs TRC:Fields of Dreams:FieldsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Daly / Nick Genovese vs Shane Murphy / Trudie Gubitz6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKim Bandak / Anthony Kim vs Stuart Swan / Jenna Stanley6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSilvia Islam / Sohel Islam vs Ron Corda / Christine Kay6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 7.0 Mixed 3
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CP:Unstrung Heroes:das Neves/Torres061448118
2MRC:All Mixed Up:Islam0613512143
3KH:Love Hurts:Welch0613512129
4CP:UnMatchables:Zaeske0612615137
5MRC:Match Makers:Capanna/Kinoshita0611718143
6SOL:Chip 'N Charge:Corrado/Simmons0610819159
7CP:Chelsea Tsunami:Raman0661225182
8CP:Point Players:Clarke/Garcia0651326169
9TRC:Fields of Dreams:Fields0631530191
104S:2021 40+ Mixed Reactions:Gregor/Haskins0631531202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Julie Mooney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Anthony Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Sohel Islam
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Matthew Berger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Nancy Hawley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Bruce Ratcliffe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Kim Bandak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Silvia Islam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Susan Daly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Karen Hanley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jeffrey Hanley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mina Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nick Genovese
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Susan Ratcliffe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Berger + Nancy Hawley11551% games+3.9% vs expected
Susan Daly + Matthew Berger4553% games+2.8% vs expected
Susan Ratcliffe + Bruce Ratcliffe14756% games+2.0% vs expected
Silvia Islam + Sohel Islam10458% games−0.8% vs expected
Karen Hanley + Jeffrey Hanley6945% gamesnot enough data
Nick Genovese + Susan Daly5163% gamesnot enough data
Silvia Islam + Matthew Berger134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Daly + Sohel Islam033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Mooney
115W–81L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Anthony Kim
4W–3L career · type M · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sohel Islam
87W–66L career · 3 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.66
Matthew Berger
103W–63L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
3.45
Nancy Hawley
101W–78L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Bruce Ratcliffe
33W–21L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kim Bandak
141W–129L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.22
Silvia Islam
113W–111L career · 2 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.07
Susan Daly
102W–88L career · 4 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.00
Karen Hanley
103W–111L career · 2 lines in 2021
76%24%<1%
2.91
Jeffrey Hanley
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mina Kim
60W–53L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nick Genovese
103W–87L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Ratcliffe
78W–63L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.