Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Miller/Miller

2023 ITA Mixed 18 & Over · mixed 6.5 18 & over

12 players · average NTRP 3.20 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-09-15vs Liberty Park Tennis-Torres/DelongWon 21
W#1 DoublesMegan Archibald / Lance Archibald vs Jamie DeLong / Tam Vu6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKris Denos / Sundi Brown vs Katie Leikin / Endhi Visser6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHolly Miller / Nathan Nguyen vs Michael Isaza / Sophie Bellina7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-08vs Sports Mall-Nelson/ShoffLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Rozsa / Karen Rozsa vs Darren Nelson / Amber Thompson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMegan Archibald / Lance Archibald vs Aurie Colligan / Cameron Colligan3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBarbara Haymore / David Haymore vs Trevor Pasmann / Brenda Mann2-6, 4-6
2023-08-25vs Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/MurrayLost 12
L#1 DoublesRyan Miller / Holly Miller vs Thomas Good / Nikki Mower1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLance Archibald / Megan Archibald vs Donald Bayna / Jane Chandramouli6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNathan Nguyen / Lindsay Lafeen vs Nicholas Ujifusa / Tiffany Ujifusa3-6, 2-6
2023-08-10vs Sports Mall-Henderson/WalljasperLost 03
L#1 DoublesLindsay Lafeen / Nathan Nguyen vs Alycia Anthony / Adam Creer2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKris Denos / Sundi Brown vs Arunnatesh Muthukkumaraswamy / Yoko Walljasper1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBarbara Haymore / David Haymore vs DeeAnn Henderson / Jeff Henderson1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesKris Denos / Sundi Brown vs Manti Hansen / Morgan Hansen1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRyan Miller / Holly Miller vs Mark Follette / Karla Block6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Rozsa / Karen Rozsa vs James Wang / Anna Palmer6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesNathan Nguyen / Lindsay Lafeen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Byington / Kris Denos vs Mark Follette / Stef Charlesworth3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Rozsa / Karen Rozsa vs Marilee Cracroft / Tod Cracroft5-7
2023-07-21vs Liberty Park Tennis-Torres/DelongLost 12
W#1 DoublesKris Denos / Sundi Brown vs Kassie Torres / Fernando Torres6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Rozsa / Karen Rozsa vs Molly Adams / Endhi Visser4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Haymore / Barbara Haymore vs Sameer Bhadouria / Sara Ray1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-07-14vs Sports Mall-Nelson/ShoffLost 12
W#1 DoublesRyan Miller / Holly Miller vs Andrew Bliss / Elma Tatarevic6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNathan Nguyen / Lindsay Lafeen vs Darren Nelson / Amber Thompson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKris Denos / Sundi Brown vs Trevor Pasmann / Brenda Mann4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · mixed 6.5 18 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Nelson/Shoff6215924220
2Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/Murray44131125196
3Liberty Park Tennis-Miller/Miller35121232231
4Salt Lake Tennis-Ostrander/Ostrander0822244267

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
David Rozsa
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Kris Denos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Lindsay Lafeen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Linda Byington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Karen Rozsa
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.33
Barbara Haymore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Holly Miller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lance Archibald
published
Megan Archibald
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nathan Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Ryan Miller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sundi Brown
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Rozsa + David Rozsa263946% games−4.1% vs expected
Sundi Brown + Kris Denos6548% games−9.7% vs expected
Megan Archibald + Lance Archibald5070% gamesnot enough data
Lindsay Lafeen + Nathan Nguyen033 matchesnot enough data
Holly Miller + Ryan Miller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Rozsa
179W–154L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Kris Denos
82W–60L career · 6 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.15
3.5
Lindsay Lafeen
32W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Linda Byington
72W–70L career · 1 line in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.06
3
Karen Rozsa
187W–205L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
2.77
2.5
Barbara Haymore
11W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%89%11%
2.33
Holly Miller
12W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lance Archibald
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Archibald
92W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nathan Nguyen
55W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ryan Miller
27W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sundi Brown
36W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.