Teams

Armitage

2022 WI Other · 2022 WI Adult 55+ 7.0 Mixed Weekend Warrior

6 players · average NTRP / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-10-09vs HammondLost 03
L#1 DoublesTheresa Palasota / Tom Leggett vs David Gahagan / Zita Wenda7-9
L#2 DoublesLynn Armitage / John Cao vs Ken Redman / Amy Buege4-8
L#3 DoublesMichael Finnegan / Karelyn Hopkins vs Kevin Struck / Christine Frank6-8
2022-10-09vs RichmondWon 21
W#1 DoublesTom Leggett / Theresa Palasota vs Patricia Hanz / David Feiss8-3
L#2 DoublesJohn Cao / Karelyn Hopkins vs Linda Match / Rick O'Connor1-8
W#3 DoublesLynn Armitage / Michael Finnegan vs Carrie Buri / Jack Buri8-1
2022-10-09vs SiehoffWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Cao / Lynn Armitage vs John Plotkin / Melanie Kuzmanovic8-5
W#2 DoublesKarelyn Hopkins / Michael Finnegan vs James Lambiris / Kathy Kort9-8
W#3 DoublesTheresa Palasota / Tom Leggett vs Rob Martin / Robin Siehoff8-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2022 WI Adult 55+ 7.0 Mixed Weekend Warrior
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hammond2163356
2Richmond2163346
3Armitage2154451
4Siehoff0318872

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Tom Leggett
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published
2.99
Michael Finnegan
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.96
Karelyn Hopkins
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.85
Theresa Palasota
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
John Cao
usually #2 Doubles 69%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Lynn Armitage
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karelyn Hopkins + John Cao224 matchesnot enough data
John Cao + Lynn Armitage224 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Palasota + Tom Leggett213 matchesnot enough data
Karelyn Hopkins + Michael Finnegan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Leggett
47W–85L career · 9 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
Michael Finnegan
36W–61L career · 8 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
Karelyn Hopkins
291W–192L career · 14 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
Theresa Palasota
102W–175L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
John Cao
83W–51L career · 13 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynn Armitage
65W–75L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.